| Can we call Wlad the man at HW? | |
|
+3Canvas marbleheadmaui Birdofthad 7 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:18 am | |
| Because of his brother can we call Wlad the man? Also if we can when did he become the man at HW? |
|
| |
Birdofthad Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Ken shamrock, Frank Shamrock, Guy Mezger, Pete Williams, you get it Lions Den Posts : 17542 Join date : 2009-07-19 Age : 37 Location : D Town
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:26 am | |
| I honestly think Vitali is and has been | |
|
| |
Birdofthad Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Ken shamrock, Frank Shamrock, Guy Mezger, Pete Williams, you get it Lions Den Posts : 17542 Join date : 2009-07-19 Age : 37 Location : D Town
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:26 am | |
| Sam Peter and Arreolla alone were better opponents than anything Wlad has had in the last 5 years | |
|
| |
marbleheadmaui Red Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Arguello, Finito, Duran, Saad Muhammad Posts : 4040 Join date : 2010-05-16
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:42 am | |
| - soonermark890 wrote:
- Because of his brother can we call Wlad the man? Also if we can when did he become the man at HW?
I don't know what we do about the Wlad-Vitali situation. I guess I give them a pass. I think Wlad is the man to the extent the family relationship permits it. As of when? I'll punt and accept Ring Magazine's judgement that he became the man when he defeated Chagaev. I guess. | |
|
| |
Birdofthad Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Ken shamrock, Frank Shamrock, Guy Mezger, Pete Williams, you get it Lions Den Posts : 17542 Join date : 2009-07-19 Age : 37 Location : D Town
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:44 am | |
| I shed a tear for the division if the winner of Klitschko vs Ibragimov tap session is considered the man
| |
|
| |
Canvas Purple Belt
Posts : 1508 Join date : 2010-05-15
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:03 pm | |
| Of course. When Wlad #1 defeated Chagaev #2 | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:04 pm | |
| - Birdofthad wrote:
- Sam Peter and Arreolla alone were better opponents than anything Wlad has had in the last 5 years
See Vitali is the problem for Wlad to me but did Wlad become the MAN when he beat Chris Bryd? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:06 pm | |
| - marbleheadmaui wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- Because of his brother can we call Wlad the man? Also if we can when did he become the man at HW?
I don't know what we do about the Wlad-Vitali situation. I guess I give them a pass.
I think Wlad is the man to the extent the family relationship permits it. As of when? I'll punt and accept Ring Magazine's judgement that he became the man when he defeated Chagaev.
I guess. So he was not the MAN when he beat Bryd? |
|
| |
captainanddew Brown Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Ricky Burns Posts : 2946 Join date : 2010-05-22 Age : 47 Location : Richmond, Virginia
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:09 pm | |
| Wlad became the "man" when he started tagging Hayden. As for being the man in boxing, I begrudgingly give it to him.
The better question is who wins between Big and Baby Bro??? At this point, I take Baby Bro because he will keep Big Bro at bay with the jab (and Vitali isn't the same fighter he was 18 months ago). There will be some tough moments but Baby Bro won't need any tirades from Manny as Big Bro brings out his inner warrior. | |
|
| |
marbleheadmaui Red Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Arguello, Finito, Duran, Saad Muhammad Posts : 4040 Join date : 2010-05-16
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:10 pm | |
| - soonermark890 wrote:
- marbleheadmaui wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- Because of his brother can we call Wlad the man? Also if we can when did he become the man at HW?
I don't know what we do about the Wlad-Vitali situation. I guess I give them a pass.
I think Wlad is the man to the extent the family relationship permits it. As of when? I'll punt and accept Ring Magazine's judgement that he became the man when he defeated Chagaev.
I guess. So he was not the MAN when he beat Bryd? Geeze I don't think so. What possible claim to being the man did Chris Byrd ever have? Lennox had become lineal champ when he beat Shannon Briggs. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:24 pm | |
| As much as it hurts me to say this but Wladimir is the man at HW right now |
|
| |
Canvas Purple Belt
Posts : 1508 Join date : 2010-05-15
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:28 pm | |
| Wlad beat Povetkin, Chagaev, and Chambers, - those three outside of Vitali are likely the best heavyweights in he world.
also Ring world champ.
It's time for the great Vitali to end his career, but it appears he is going to back track on his plan to retire at the end of 2010 and instead face Adamek in 2011. | |
|
| |
Birdofthad Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Ken shamrock, Frank Shamrock, Guy Mezger, Pete Williams, you get it Lions Den Posts : 17542 Join date : 2009-07-19 Age : 37 Location : D Town
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:45 pm | |
| Byrd is definitely still Wlads biggest win IMO
Byrd is very underrated | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:54 pm | |
| This is when he became THE MAN. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:58 pm | |
| - marbleheadmaui wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- marbleheadmaui wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- Because of his brother can we call Wlad the man? Also if we can when did he become the man at HW?
I don't know what we do about the Wlad-Vitali situation. I guess I give them a pass.
I think Wlad is the man to the extent the family relationship permits it. As of when? I'll punt and accept Ring Magazine's judgement that he became the man when he defeated Chagaev.
I guess. So he was not the MAN when he beat Bryd? Geeze I don't think so. What possible claim to being the man did Chris Byrd ever have? Lennox had become lineal champ when he beat Shannon Briggs. My thing about this is that at the time He was coming off the win over Peter then he took out the longest reigning champ in Chris Byrd. So he now held 3 trinkets. I know that does not mean much but does that not make him the man at that point? I mean in 2005 who was the number 2 behind him? It would have had to be Bryd. Then in 2006 he beat Byrd the number two guy right? I would look it up but every site I try is blocked by our school. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:03 pm | |
| - soonermark890 wrote:
- marbleheadmaui wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- marbleheadmaui wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- Because of his brother can we call Wlad the man? Also if we can when did he become the man at HW?
I don't know what we do about the Wlad-Vitali situation. I guess I give them a pass.
I think Wlad is the man to the extent the family relationship permits it. As of when? I'll punt and accept Ring Magazine's judgement that he became the man when he defeated Chagaev.
I guess. So he was not the MAN when he beat Bryd? Geeze I don't think so. What possible claim to being the man did Chris Byrd ever have? Lennox had become lineal champ when he beat Shannon Briggs. My thing about this is that at the time He was coming off the win over Peter then he took out the longest reigning champ in Chris Byrd. So he now held 3 trinkets. I know that does not mean much but does that not make him the man at that point? I mean in 2005 who was the number 2 behind him? It would have had to be Bryd. Then in 2006 he beat Byrd the number two guy right?
I would look it up but every site I try is blocked by our school. From Cyberboxingzone- Year End 2006 Champ: Vacant 1-Wlad Klit 2-Oleg Maskaev 3-Sam Peter 4-James Toney 5-Shannon Briggs 6-Sergei Liakhovich 7-Lamon Brewster 8-Nicolay Valuev 9-Ruslan Chagaev 10-John Ruiz Year End 2005 Champ: Vacant 1-Chris Byrd 2-Hasim Rahman 3-James Toney 4-Lamon Brewster 5-John Ruiz 6-Monte Barrett 7-Calvin Brock 8-Wlad Klit 9-Sam Peter 10-Nicolay Valuev Year End 2004 Champ: Vit Klit 1-Chris Byrd 2-John Ruiz 3-Hasim Rahman 4-James Toney 5-Monte Barrett 6-Andrew Golota 7-Fres Oquendo 8-Jameel McCline 9-Corrie Sanders 10-Lamon Brewster |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:10 pm | |
| - freakzilla316ftw wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- marbleheadmaui wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- marbleheadmaui wrote:
- soonermark890 wrote:
- Because of his brother can we call Wlad the man? Also if we can when did he become the man at HW?
I don't know what we do about the Wlad-Vitali situation. I guess I give them a pass.
I think Wlad is the man to the extent the family relationship permits it. As of when? I'll punt and accept Ring Magazine's judgement that he became the man when he defeated Chagaev.
I guess. So he was not the MAN when he beat Bryd? Geeze I don't think so. What possible claim to being the man did Chris Byrd ever have? Lennox had become lineal champ when he beat Shannon Briggs. My thing about this is that at the time He was coming off the win over Peter then he took out the longest reigning champ in Chris Byrd. So he now held 3 trinkets. I know that does not mean much but does that not make him the man at that point? I mean in 2005 who was the number 2 behind him? It would have had to be Bryd. Then in 2006 he beat Byrd the number two guy right?
I would look it up but every site I try is blocked by our school. From Cyberboxingzone-
Year End 2006
Champ: Vacant 1-Wlad Klit 2-Oleg Maskaev 3-Sam Peter 4-James Toney 5-Shannon Briggs 6-Sergei Liakhovich 7-Lamon Brewster 8-Nicolay Valuev 9-Ruslan Chagaev 10-John Ruiz
Year End 2005
Champ: Vacant 1-Chris Byrd 2-Hasim Rahman 3-James Toney 4-Lamon Brewster 5-John Ruiz 6-Monte Barrett 7-Calvin Brock 8-Wlad Klit 9-Sam Peter 10-Nicolay Valuev
Year End 2004
Champ: Vit Klit 1-Chris Byrd 2-John Ruiz 3-Hasim Rahman 4-James Toney 5-Monte Barrett 6-Andrew Golota 7-Fres Oquendo 8-Jameel McCline 9-Corrie Sanders 10-Lamon Brewster So he was ranked that high when Wlad took him out. I thought my memory was correct. But still was he officially the MAN when he beat Byrd? |
|
| |
kbyte Yellow Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Oscar De la Hoya, Ricky Hatton Posts : 196 Join date : 2010-05-19
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:11 pm | |
| - freakzilla316ftw wrote:
- This is when he became THE MAN.
I hate you Wlad. I hate you. | |
|
| |
WinstonSmith Purple Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Marvin Hagler,Ben Henderson,Rich Franklin,Clay Guida Posts : 1308 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 62 Location : West of the Mississippi
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:12 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:13 pm | |
| - WinstonSmith wrote:
- He's the man by default.
I dont think that has ever happened in Boxing. LOL |
|
| |
WinstonSmith Purple Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Marvin Hagler,Ben Henderson,Rich Franklin,Clay Guida Posts : 1308 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 62 Location : West of the Mississippi
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:16 pm | |
| - soonermark890 wrote:
- WinstonSmith wrote:
- He's the man by default.
I dont think that has ever happened in Boxing. LOL Not a good testimony of the HW division as it now stands. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:16 pm | |
| He officially became the man in 2009.
August 2009
Champ: Wlad Klit 1-Vit Klit 2-Alex Povetkin 3-Eddie Chambers 4-Ruslan Chagev 5-Nicolay Valuev 6-Chris Arreola 7-David Haye 8-John Ruiz 9-Denis Boytsov 10-Alex Dimitrenko
Year End 2008
Champ: Vacant 1-Wlad Klit 2-Vit Klit 3-Ruslan Chagaev 4-Alex Povetkin 5-Nicolay Valuev 6-Sultan Imbragimov 7-Samuel Peter 8-Oleg Maskaev 9-Juan Carlos Gomez 10-Alex Dimitrenko
Year End 2007
Champ: Vacant 1-Wlad Klit 2-Samuel Peter 3-Oleg Maskaev 4-Ruslan Chagaev 5-Nicolay Valuev 6-Sultan Imbragimov 7-Sergei Liakhovich 8-Vladimir Virchis 9-Tony Thompson 10-Alex Povetkin |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:18 pm | |
| - freakzilla316ftw wrote:
- He officially became the man in 2009.
August 2009
Champ: Wlad Klit 1-Vit Klit 2-Alex Povetkin 3-Eddie Chambers 4-Ruslan Chagev 5-Nicolay Valuev 6-Chris Arreola 7-David Haye 8-John Ruiz 9-Denis Boytsov 10-Alex Dimitrenko
Year End 2008
Champ: Vacant 1-Wlad Klit 2-Vit Klit 3-Ruslan Chagaev 4-Alex Povetkin 5-Nicolay Valuev 6-Sultan Imbragimov 7-Samuel Peter 8-Oleg Maskaev 9-Juan Carlos Gomez 10-Alex Dimitrenko
Year End 2007
Champ: Vacant 1-Wlad Klit 2-Samuel Peter 3-Oleg Maskaev 4-Ruslan Chagaev 5-Nicolay Valuev 6-Sultan Imbragimov 7-Sergei Liakhovich 8-Vladimir Virchis 9-Tony Thompson 10-Alex Povetkin I guess, I just dont understand the reason. |
|
| |
WinstonSmith Purple Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Marvin Hagler,Ben Henderson,Rich Franklin,Clay Guida Posts : 1308 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 62 Location : West of the Mississippi
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:18 pm | |
| Looking at the fighters on that list makes me want to vomit. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:18 pm | |
| - WinstonSmith wrote:
- Looking at the fighters on that list makes me want to vomit.
LOL |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Can we call Wlad the man at HW? | |
| |
|
| |
| Can we call Wlad the man at HW? | |
|