Wolfgangsta Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Conor McGregor, Machida, Jon Jones, Ronda Rousey Posts : 18955 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : USA
| Subject: Why Pettis should fight next. Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:13 am | |
| In football they talk about a quarterback's ability to win in the 4th quarter. NBA legacies are judged by performances "in the clutch". There is a common thread that separates the good from the great, and the great from the legends. How do you perform when the game is on the line? Anthony Pettis's Showtime kick, in addition to being the MMA highlight of the year and an ESPN Sportscenter top ten play of the year in all sports combined, was without question the most clutch move in the history of MMA.
There is a lot of debate on the scoring of the Edgar-Maynard bout already, and some of my rational is predicated on how I personally scored it, but the overall point can still be applied. I had the fight even heading into the final round, with Maynard and Edgar alternating the first four frames. I did not think the first round was a 10-8 because Edgar was able to mount some offense and land some clean punches after he recovered from Maynard's attack. To earn a 10-8 the round has to be a complete shutout. Was the round one sided? Sure. Was it the most dominant round of the contest? Absolutely. But I don't believe it was one sided to the point it deserved a 10-8 advantage. The fight on my card was dead even heading into the last frame. The last round was the closest of the contest, and I felt no fighter did enough to assert himself. On my card it was a clear 10-10, which made the bout a 48-48 draw on my scorecard.
Anthony Pettis and Benson Henderson heading into the fifth round was also dead even. One could argue the fight was still in question until the moment he launched off the cage. And this is the difference between the two fights. Anthony Pettis literally goes off the wall(normally this is an absurd expression) to prove he deserves to be champion. I am not questioning or criticizing the effort or action of either Edgar or Maynard, but neither fighter asserted themselves and as the fight went on, the fight became more of a stalemate. Neither fighter truly "went for broke", not at least when compared to what Anthony Pettis did.
I don't think it's fair to penalize Pettis, who recorded one of the great crunch time techniques in the history of the game because neither Gray nor Frankie could do enough to truly win the fight. Reward Anthony Pettis with the title fight he earned against Benson Henderson. Gray Maynard will always be there to take on the winner. Jonathan Snowden brings up a valid point about the sport's need for an epic trilogy, but there will be plenty of time for that down the line. The sport also needs action heros and crunch time performers. Scratch that, the sport needs Showtime performers.
| |
|
captain organic Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: Why Pettis should fight next. Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:02 pm | |
| I tend to think Maynard should get it. A draw in a title fight in which the challenger had the champ on the brink(and that 1st rnd was clearly a 10-8 rnd), is as close to an immediate rematch situation as you can get.
I also thought there were exchanges late in the fight in which both fighters were going for the kill. Because they weren't some crazy video game move, or because they didn't quite find their mark is not evidence of guys not going for it. I also think basing Pettis's title worthy credentials on one kick is playing right into the hands of the guys saying Pettis is not worthy at all of a title shot. Yeah it was the cherry on top, but Pettis built a pretty good sundae underneath that cherry.
Only problem I see with making Pettis wait is it takes the thrill out of champ vs champ. U can't make Pettis wait with the belt idle, and u can't have him carry that belt into an intermediate fight either. This is probably the reasoning, not some flashy kick, that will get Pettis the next shot at edgar. | |
|
Primetyme199 Brown Belt
Posts : 2916 Join date : 2009-07-30 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: Why Pettis should fight next. Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:21 pm | |
| Here is why I would rather see Pettis get the next shot.
Lets say it's Edgar vs Maynard and Maynard wins a close or split decision. Does Frankie get an immediate rematch for that? If they do that it would be a bit ridiculous with the rematches but on the other hand doesn't he deserve it if it's a closely contested fight? | |
|
oggy420 Bronze Belt
Posts : 6483 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: Why Pettis should fight next. Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:43 pm | |
| pettis fights jim miller. Maynard and Edgar rematch. | |
|
Primetyme199 Brown Belt
Posts : 2916 Join date : 2009-07-30 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: Why Pettis should fight next. Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:21 pm | |
| | |
|
acccardinal12 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Cung Le, BJ Penn, Mayhem, Chael Sonnen, Anthony Pettis Posts : 10925 Join date : 2009-12-04 Age : 48 Location : Kentuckiana
| Subject: Re: Why Pettis should fight next. Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:57 pm | |
| - Primetyme199 wrote:
- What about Sotoropolis?
Give him Bendo! | |
|
killerofchicken Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Mauricio Shogun Rua, BJ Penn, AXE MURDERER,Fedor, CroCop, Vitor Belfort, JDS Posts : 16162 Join date : 2010-02-28 Age : 38 Location : Iowa
| Subject: Re: Why Pettis should fight next. Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:33 pm | |
| if there was a clear cut winner then Pettis should have gotten the next shot, but in case of a draw you'd have to be stupid not to give Gray another shot | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Why Pettis should fight next. | |
| |
|