Condit-Diaz rematch still work in progress, might be off

Hopefully it was a failed drug test so the rematch shit can get put to bed. No need for it

People act like half the fight community isn't split or that Condit didn't fight in a way which destroyed his reputation. There is a HUGE gap between STANDNBANG or staying on the cage letting Diaz win and what Condit did. Look, if yall believe that Condit had to flea across the.cage and refuse to engage for over 20 minutes in a 25 minute affair to win I donno what to tell yall. Condit could have won and been mire aggressive. I like guys that WAR. JUST BLEEEED.

cheekynffc wrote:

Ali wrote:

Don't really see the need for one. Props to Condit for being willing to risk his title shot.

aren't hotly debated decisions the best reason of any to have a rematch?

I wasn't aware this was a hotly debated decision, apart from Nick's loyal fans and that weird, peculiar Ludo there hasn't been much of an outcry.

someone failed a post fight drug test at 143

Ali wrote:

cheekynffc wrote:

Ali wrote:

Don't really see the need for one. Props to Condit for being willing to risk his title shot.

aren't hotly debated decisions the best reason of any to have a rematch?

I wasn't aware this was a hotly debated decision, apart from Nick's loyal fans and that weird, peculiar Ludo there hasn't been much of an outcry.

have you not been on any mma sites. This is a controversial decision and after rewatching it i gave 1 and 2 to diaz and round 5. Rogan said after rewatching it he thinks Diaz won too.

oggy420 wrote:

someone failed a post fight drug test at 143

Condit?

OU wrote:

oggy420 wrote:

someone failed a post fight drug test at 143

Condit?

Puff The Magic Dragon

i hope not nick, no rematch if he didn't get it out of his system in time. Everyone knows he still smokes he's just in to a lot of natural detoxification techniques that push it out of his system in time to get tested.

Ali wrote:

OU wrote:

oggy420 wrote:

someone failed a post fight drug test at 143

Condit?

Puff The Magic Dragon

I think Condit was on acid. He thought Nick was the devil, that is why he was running in fear.

OU wrote:

Ali wrote:

OU wrote:

oggy420 wrote:

someone failed a post fight drug test at 143

Condit?

Puff The Magic Dragon

I think Condit was on acid. He thought Nick was the devil, that is why he was running in fear.

LOL I'll give you that one.

This is the most hotly argued fight in MMA history. Its bizarre reading those who don't know or pretend it isn't...under a rock much?

The fight was getting discussion because of the way Condit fought. This isn't even on the same level as everyone calling for a rematch because Shogun got blatantly robbed against Machida

Yeah I can't call this fight robbery. There were some very close rounds that could have gone either way. Which is obvious by the varying scores everywhere.

Do you really think Diaz will change his approach? It is going to be the same thing,

"HEY.. lets get 3 different judges and see if it gets scored differently this time!!!! "

bobbitt15 wrote:

The fight was getting discussion because of the way Condit fought. This isn't even on the same level as everyone calling for a rematch because Shogun got blatantly robbed against Machida

Shogun v Machida is in my top 5 of horrible decision. A few Garcia and Bisping wins are also up there.

Agree that this one is not that bad. On the same level as Rampage v Forrest. Close fight that the judges got right, but not everyone agrees though.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

This is the most hotly argued fight in MMA history. Its bizarre reading those who don't know or pretend it isn't...under a rock much?

Oh Wolf you never fail to amuse me.

The post fight reaction from fighters and trainers and the hostility between sides on internet forums over a fight is larger than ive ever seen between two sides. Its one of the dumbest debates ever honestly as each side becomes a cartoon parody of itself.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

This is the most hotly argued fight in MMA history. Its bizarre reading those who don't know or pretend it isn't...under a rock much?

Dude just stop this would have to be your first ever MMA card to say something like that and this was about the fourth most controversial decision on the card.

When dudes get robbed people demand rematches. This boards biggest Diaz supporter won't call the fight what everyone calls a fight before demanding a rematch.

To consider a fight "robbery" I would have to think that there were some rounds that where CLEARLY won by Diaz that were not scored that way. But the most I can say is there were some very close rounds that COULD have been scored for Diaz. Those same rounds could have also gone to Condit. I saw a tough fight, some rounds were difficult to score, hard to look at any round with any certainty. Some rounds are debatable. You could argue both sides for a few of those rounds and make sense either way. But even as a major Diaz fan I just can't with a straight face say Diaz for sure won rounds____. Because there were obviously some tough call rounds, which again is supported by the varying scores for each round everywhere.

GDPofDRC wrote:

Wolfgangsta wrote:

This is the most hotly argued fight in MMA history. Its bizarre reading those who don't know or pretend it isn't...under a rock much?

Dude just stop this would have to be your first ever MMA card to say something like that and this was about the fourth most controversial decision on the card.

You're oblivious. Ive never seen such reactions and arguments on facebook, twitter or bloodyelbow. Online polls internet over are split pretty evenly. Most people who watched Machida Shogun or Penn Edgar agreed the dec was wrong, this fight however has people so divided on a philosophical level that they pretend that the fight was so obvious no one could possibly disagree. Never has a fight been this disputed in the MMA community. NP is out if touch with the rest of the sport more and more.