PETA upset over Mario Land LOL

OU wrote:

GDPofDRC wrote:

Or a human?

Seems a bit extreme. You are card carrying member of PETA?

Humans are much more dangerous than bobcats. And what is the big difference really?

GDPofDRC wrote:

Josh, that's just a bob cat.

I've never seen one that big I've only seen them compact.

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

It's not an endangered species. Might make a nice rug. What's the difference between shooting this and shooting a bear?

i never said shooting a bear was acceptable... its just not necessary. i understand if its in self defense. and ppl actually eat bear.

now i sound like a peta bitch...

So are you against any hunting/fishing that doesn't result in the consumption of the animal killed? Unless it's a danger to others.

GDPofDRC wrote:

OU wrote:

GDPofDRC wrote:

Or a human?

Seems a bit extreme. You are card carrying member of PETA?

Humans are much more dangerous than bobcats. And what is the big difference really?

So are you for hunting humans or against hunting bobcats?

josh200612 wrote:

What kind of cat is that? All I know is that I would never hunt something that can kill me. He has some balls both ways posting that pic and hunting that cat.

It looks like to a bobcat to me, being the only striped big cat in the US that hasn't been hunted to extinction.

For lots of dead humans, let the animals feast on their carcasses, which would probably give them cancers.

OU wrote:

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

It's not an endangered species. Might make a nice rug. What's the difference between shooting this and shooting a bear?

i never said shooting a bear was acceptable... its just not necessary. i understand if its in self defense. and ppl actually eat bear.

now i sound like a peta bitch...

So are you against any hunting/fishing that doesn't result in the consumption of the animal killed? Unless it's a danger to others.

pretty much, hate to see an animal killed for nothing...

If it was hurting humans then ok but if they hunted it just for the fun of it then it's wrong.

freakzilla wrote:

If it was hurting humans then ok but if they hunted it just for the fun of it then it's wrong.

why?

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

It's not an endangered species. Might make a nice rug. What's the difference between shooting this and shooting a bear?

i never said shooting a bear was acceptable... its just not necessary. i understand if its in self defense. and ppl actually eat bear.

now i sound like a peta bitch...

So are you against any hunting/fishing that doesn't result in the consumption of the animal killed? Unless it's a danger to others.

pretty much, hate to see an animal killed for nothing...

Are you sure the exotic look of the animal isn't a factor? Would it be the same thought if it was an ugly buzzard?

OU wrote:

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

It's not an endangered species. Might make a nice rug. What's the difference between shooting this and shooting a bear?

i never said shooting a bear was acceptable... its just not necessary. i understand if its in self defense. and ppl actually eat bear.

now i sound like a peta bitch...

So are you against any hunting/fishing that doesn't result in the consumption of the animal killed? Unless it's a danger to others.

pretty much, hate to see an animal killed for nothing...

Are you sure the exotic look of the animal isn't a factor? Would it be the same thought if it was an ugly buzzard?

yeah it would... yes it is the same you ars! i cried for a week after running over a turtle with my car! and now u reminded me of it

back to crying

now if it was a wild hog? shot that bastard up and put it over the fire! roast that pig and feed me for a week!

Not all animal life is treated equal. That's just...

Hughes just doesn't want to hunt anything that knows how to throw an overhand right. Pussy

Nothing wrong with hunting. Punch of pussies on twitter talking shit.

bobbitt15 wrote:

Hughes just doesn't want to hunt anything that knows how to throw an overhand right. Pussy

LOL so funny and true

OU wrote:

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

It's not an endangered species. Might make a nice rug. What's the difference between shooting this and shooting a bear?

i never said shooting a bear was acceptable... its just not necessary. i understand if its in self defense. and ppl actually eat bear.

now i sound like a peta bitch...

So are you against any hunting/fishing that doesn't result in the consumption of the animal killed? Unless it's a danger to others.

I am.

I can respect that. I will continue to pick and choose which animals I feel deserve my sympathy the most. Case by case bases.

I'm against going out and hunting for sport with a weapon. Man up and go mono a mono and let's see how tough you are

bobbitt15 wrote:

I'm against going out and hunting for sport with a weapon. Man up and go mono a mono and let's see how tough you are

What if you make the weapon yourself? That is still a demonstration of your skill and one way to focus on the superior trait you posses over that animal, complex thought process. Fight smart, not hard. If that animal can somehow come up with a weapon, more power to them.

Dan Hardy

Quote :

Look at what I killed. Aren't I the man. This is the only thing I have found that cures my impotence. http://t.co/P9lYByUS

LOL awwww poor Dan wants to stay relevant. Be thankful you're not already in BAMMA.

I don't approve of their conduct!

OU wrote:

LOL awwww poor Dan wants to stay relevant. Be thankful you're not already in BAMMA.

he's just tryin' to get a fight... what a pussy, eh farmer

I agree with his tactics if he's trying to get Hughes to call Joe Silva and say "I want to fight Dan Hardy", but he really should have picked someone a little more passive at this stage in their career. Hughes can still bring it, and he's actually improving his striking right now.