Who should be first in line for a title shot

Jim Miller
Aussie George

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Jim Miller
Aussie George

should be: Miller
will be: George

I think Jim.

we're so prisoners of the moment here...

I still think George needs a win over a top guy. Siver doesn't really fit that mold though

I love George I just think jim is the next in line. i wouldnt argue either way though.

Neither, Miller vs Sot for next shot.

Siver is what, 5-1 UFC? Fighters can stack UFC wins these days and still be considered average.

LA wrote:

Neither, Miller vs Sot for next shot.

Good idea. But they're probably stacking up contenders.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Siver is what, 5-1 UFC? Fighters can stack UFC wins these days and still be considered average.

6-4 but he really hasn't been in there with legitimate top competition save Maynard which he lost

Oh, dag he's been around longer than I remember. Ya he was 5-1 in his last six before his last bout, so that's why I was thinking that. At some point wins over solid UFC competition are enough aren't they?

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Siver is what, 5-1 UFC? Fighters can stack UFC wins these days and still be considered average.

Siver has been facing middle of the pack opponents since he got to the UFC with the exception of Pearson who soundly outclassed him for two out of three rounds and Maynard who had no problems with him. Solid wins don't mean enough in the UFC's Lightweight division. 60% isn't near enough, especially when your not fighting anyone in the top ten at the time.

George in my book, But Miller makes a strong case as well.

They'll fight eachother.

They'll have time while eitheir Bendo or Pettis is getting an unwarranted title shot.

I say George right now. I had know idea Miller was 6-0 though, so I guess I have been mislead by UFC fighter marketing, lol.

The UFC doesn't do enough to build up some of their up and comers and under the radar fighters.