Hughes laughs at Rogan's commentary

http://www.mmamania.com/2010/10/25/1773496/matt-hughes-remarks-jake-shields-performance-and-joe-rogan-commentary

Quote :

"Jake Shields fight was interesting to me. Jake ran out of gas, but still ended up getting the split decision. From a technical view, Kampmann had a terrible fight, in my opinion, he gave the fight to Shields. One thing I will say is Joe Rogan’s commentary was a little off during the fight. The ground game was pretty even in my book with Shields doing a little more controlling. Kampmann escaped to his feet several times and Kampmann had more submission attempts than Shields had, but listening to Rogan, you would have thought Shields had submitted him the first ten seconds of being on the ground. I really think the UFC could use a third man doing the broadcast, that has some experience inside the Octagon. I don’t disagree with everything Rogan says, but there are a lot of things he says that I just laugh at."

I agree with Matt, it's time they added a third man to the commentary team.

LOL!

haha GDP posted it at the same time in the Rogan thread in the trash. Might be a more suitable place for it anyways.

No matter. I don't dislike Rogan, he knows some good stuff but he isn't perfect, he's a fan. He does good but with goldie sitting next to him always one sentence away from blowing it, the microscope is on Joe more. He needs a better counterpart, ditch Goldie and Duffer in my opinion.

I laugh at Matt Hughes in general. I made it through 1 chapter of his book before putting it down. What a fucking douche

we all know joe swings from nut sacks from time to time just like brock getting his ass beat by cain and joe still hyping him up. If joe was honest and said sheilds looks like shit out there tonight we know it would lose some cred for the upcoming shields vs gsp/kos. As sad as it is it is half his job and half bias.

LOL I just noticed a goofy Forrest in the background of that picture.

sokolkevin wrote:

we all know joe swings from nut sacks from time to time just like brock getting his ass beat by cain and joe still hyping him up. If joe was honest and said sheilds looks like shit out there tonight we know it would lose some cred for the upcoming shields vs gsp/kos. As sad as it is it is half his job and half bias.

True. It's part of his job for the company. Joe has been on the Cain Train for a while but he can't just be like me if I was doing that job, he would get canned.

sokolkevin wrote:

we all know joe swings from nut sacks from time to time just like brock getting his ass beat by cain and joe still hyping him up. If joe was honest and said sheilds looks like shit out there tonight we know it would lose some cred for the upcoming shields vs gsp/kos. As sad as it is it is half his job and half bias.

Well to be fair to Joe he did say he thought we witnessed something very special in Cain.

OU wrote:

sokolkevin wrote:

we all know joe swings from nut sacks from time to time just like brock getting his ass beat by cain and joe still hyping him up. If joe was honest and said sheilds looks like shit out there tonight we know it would lose some cred for the upcoming shields vs gsp/kos. As sad as it is it is half his job and half bias.

Well to be fair to Joe he did say he thought we witnessed something very special in Cain.

was that after dana put the belt around him lol.

Rogan is fine. Although i wouldn't mind seeing kenny or bonnar brought in for big shows as a 3rd person. And Hughes should listen to the ass babble that comes out of his own mouth before judging other people.

I'm cool with Rogan, he like every other announcer I've ever heard says some stuff that does not seem to be in line with what im watching. Nor do I see a pressing need for a 3rd man, I think Rogan and gold flow pretty well, more guys just equal more toes to step on.

As far as Rogan hyping shields, standard announcng procedure.

Rogan probably felt the need to let UFC people who never watch anything else know that Shields is the real deal because he wasn't showing it in the cage

OU wrote:

haha GDP posted it at the same time in the Rogan thread in the trash. Might be a more suitable place for it anyways.

OMG! GDP is really Matt Hughes!

Andrew the Raider King wrote:

OU wrote:

haha GDP posted it at the same time in the Rogan thread in the trash. Might be a more suitable place for it anyways.

OMG! GDP is really Matt Hughes!

You would know.

Matt Hughes is a dumbfuck. There's nothing I hate more than someone acting like you can't comment on MMA unless you've been in the cage before. That's such a crock of shit and I'm not at all surprised that it spewed from Matt Hughes' pie hole.