UFN 22 discussion

Silly?... Wolf, that pin head can take a serious shot. Did he get TKO'd?... Sure. But if you've watched Palhares over the years, you know he can take a punch. Those first few shots he took on his back last night would have Bisping'd 99% of the fighters out there. The first shot sent his arms over his head, but he was conscious taking the rest... Just unable to defend intelligently. Then again, what little intelligence was there went out the window when he lost that leg.

As far as Nate's concerned... Up until that moment he wouldn't close the distance, almost looking afraid to engage. I know it was early, but that's very un-Nate like. He wasn't landing with that throw half ass and dive back out crap he was doing. Nate looked unsure of what he was doing and Harris always has in mind what he wants to do... It's just a matter of time before he gets a limb and doesn't lose it.

Ya. I see. There was no way Palhares was ever going to win this fight.

What a let down. That was an okay FN but there was really no main event. I think Phil would of still went on to beat Nate but decided to just embarrass himself. Lame.

If he is that easily KO'd while trying to buttscoot he was in trouble anyway. Nate was never in danger in this fight.

Nate was in exactly as much danger as his opponent, more so in my opinion. And It's easy to get punched when your not fighting. Phil wasn't KO'd either, he just put himself in a dumb position to eat shots and lose. If he was Ko'd he wouldn't be standing trying to rationalize his actions in a matter of seconds after it was stopped.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

If he is that easily KO'd while trying to buttscoot he was in trouble anyway. Nate was never in danger in this fight.

Nate didn't do any damage until Harris looked away. This counts as a no fight to me. Nate didn't do anything but take advantage of an EPIC fail by Harris. Nate was never comfortable and wasn't ever going to be.

Blah blah.

He was hurt, not fighting back, and covering up. Had the ref let it go Nate would have just put him to sleep. Palhares isn't a KO striker, and Nate wasn't in submission danger and never would have been.



Sooners how old are you, 12? Shirtless thug gangster album covers? Really? 14?

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Blah blah.

He was hurt, not fighting back, and covering up. Had the ref let it go Nate would have just put him to sleep. Palhares isn't a KO striker, and Nate wasn't in submission danger and never would have been.



Sooners how old are you, 12? Shirtless thug gangster album covers? Really? 14?

13 and a half thank you very much.

OUSOONERSOU wrote:

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Blah blah.

He was hurt, not fighting back, and covering up. Had the ref let it go Nate would have just put him to sleep. Palhares isn't a KO striker, and Nate wasn't in submission danger and never would have been.



Sooners how old are you, 12? Shirtless thug gangster album covers? Really? 14?

13 and a half thank you very much.

Maybe I can be more mature and put pictures of Dinosaurs.

Really though, unless you're an uneducated black kid from the ghetto and you only have the option of being a shirtless thug gangster - the kind of nomadic African American male you see walking around the downtown of any metropolis with a population over 30,000 people in America, who the fuck thinks that shit is cool?

Sooners is the type of kid who would draw Thuglife on his stomach in marker in Jr High.

Father either non existent or otherwise entirely unengaged in your development?

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Really though, unless you're an uneducated black kid from the ghetto and you only have the option of being a shirtless thug gangster - the kind of nomadic African American male you see walking around the downtown of any metropolis with a population over 30,000 people in America, who the fuck thinks that shit is cool?

Sooners is the type of kid who would draw Thuglife on his stomach in marker in Jr High.

Father either non existent or otherwise entirely unengaged in your development?

Wolfy I'm half black. I would never write Thug Life on my stomach. I got All Eyes On Me on my back.

Please don't take this personal sooners. I will continue to bash your face in until that av is gone. You understand.

You are 100% cracker. This has been established. I'd believe the tat on your back though.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Please don't take this personal sooners. I will continue to bash your face in until that av is gone. You understand.

Ok, I'll change it. Just because I care.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

You are 100% cracker. This has been established. I'd believe the tat on your back though.

My white half finds that racist.