Jack Johnson Immortal????

Yes or No???

i say yea but i think that some people disagree.

my vote is yea though

my vote

yes

He beat Langford, Ketchell, McVea a bunch of times, George Gardner, jeanette a bunch oif times, an old Fitzsimmons, an old Jeffries, Burns.

I think that's a yeah.

also beat Denver Ed good amount of times

marbleheadmaui wrote:

He beat Langford, Ketchell, McVea a bunch of times, George Gardner, jeanette a bunch oif times, an old Fitzsimmons, an old Jeffries, Burns.

I think that's a yeah.

he lost to marvin hart though so you should probably rethink your decision

powerpuncher wrote:

marbleheadmaui wrote:

He beat Langford, Ketchell, McVea a bunch of times, George Gardner, jeanette a bunch oif times, an old Fitzsimmons, an old Jeffries, Burns.

I think that's a yeah.

he lost to marvin hart though so you should probably rethink your decision

Well and Joey Choyinski gave up 25 pounds and still KO'd him

marble why you voting now a yes on jack johnson when before you said he should not qualify for a nomination..puzzling ..

i dont see why dempsey makes it and not johnson. i would pick johnson over dempsey any day.

lets forget the list..please put in burt sugars top 100 add 25 more fighters soo everyones happy..this forum per powerpuncher did a awfull job..

Did you not get your fiber today? You sound a little.......compacted.

why yes cause im trying to make a point on our selectivity..compacted.your right.open your mouth so i can relieve myself..sarcastic jerk off.

Christ, I hope my baseball never falls in your yard.

dmar5143 wrote:

lets forget the list..please put in burt sugars top 100 add 25 more fighters soo everyones happy..this forum per powerpuncher did a awfull job..

sorry i ruined everything by starting to post again

dmar5143 wrote:

marble why you voting now a yes on jack johnson when before you said he should not qualify for a nomination..puzzling ..

If I didn't nominate Johnson it was a screw-up. The guy absolutely deserves a vote.