| Nate Diaz | |
|
+10oggy420 captain organic GDPofDRC Cu Bu Bigs03 redvexx8 bobbitt15 KingsOwn19 acccardinal12 LA 14 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
oggy420 Bronze Belt
Posts : 6483 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:03 pm | |
| I've been calling for a Nick Diaz vs Carlos Condit fight for a while, but i can settle for Nate vs Condit. | |
|
| |
LA Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva, Jose Aldo Posts : 15046 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 37 Location : Boston, Mass and Los Angeles, California
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:56 pm | |
| Nick would destroy Condit, Nate is a much better fight, I'll take Nate | |
|
| |
oggy420 Bronze Belt
Posts : 6483 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:17 am | |
| yea but this is back when Nick Diaz got little to no respect from the majority of people on this board. Now i agree Nick would beat Condit but it might be a better fight then you think, i think Condit is game. | |
|
| |
Bigs03 Black Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Fedor and GSP Posts : 3124 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 44 Location : Houston, TX
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:17 pm | |
| - tolivendiewithLA wrote:
- Nick would destroy Condit, Nate is a much better fight, I'll take Nate
Nick wouldn't destroy Condit. You have an inflated view of a lot of fighters. | |
|
| |
LA Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva, Jose Aldo Posts : 15046 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 37 Location : Boston, Mass and Los Angeles, California
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:57 pm | |
| - Bigs03 wrote:
- tolivendiewithLA wrote:
- Nick would destroy Condit, Nate is a much better fight, I'll take Nate
Nick wouldn't destroy Condit. You have an inflated view of a lot of fighters. Yet I end up being right so often Nick literally owns Condit everywhere that fight goes And that's a pretty hypocritical statement based on your views of Mir | |
|
| |
captain organic Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:16 pm | |
| I have either Diaz brother beating up Condit. | |
|
| |
Bigs03 Black Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Fedor and GSP Posts : 3124 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 44 Location : Houston, TX
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:17 pm | |
| - tolivendiewithLA wrote:
- Bigs03 wrote:
- tolivendiewithLA wrote:
- Nick would destroy Condit, Nate is a much better fight, I'll take Nate
Nick wouldn't destroy Condit. You have an inflated view of a lot of fighters. Yet I end up being right so often
Nick literally owns Condit everywhere that fight goes
And that's a pretty hypocritical statement based on your views of Mir I see no reason to think that Nick Diaz would destroy Condit. As far as my views on Frank Mir? He's a top 10...probably closer to top 5 HW in the world. Most people agree that he has skills and is one of the best in the world at HW. If you or anyone else thinks he's a d-bag that's fine, it's a matter of opinion. However, whether he's a great HW fighter and highly ranked in the world is not opinion at all. | |
|
| |
LA Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva, Jose Aldo Posts : 15046 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 37 Location : Boston, Mass and Los Angeles, California
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:43 pm | |
| Nick is better than Condit everywhere that fights goes, hell I think Nate would beat Condit at 170.
And you think Mir is better than myself or some others, that's how that relates, you said I have an inflated view of fighters, and I basically said you have the same thing for Mir. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Nate Diaz | |
| |
|
| |
| Nate Diaz | |
|