Could 3 FWs be top 10 P4P?

I remember that. Don't remember if I listed in it though. When I get to making a rank for all of the divisions I would like to make a p4p.

Top 20 is fine, top 25 is even fine, after that it'd be a bit much, make a top 25 then look at the name of ur 25th guy, he's probably a pretty damn legit guy.

tolivendiewithLA wrote:

Top 20 is fine, top 25 is even fine, after that it'd be a bit much, make a top 25 then look at the name of ur 25th guy, he's probably a pretty damn legit guy.

Exactly, we are talking p4p, not divisional rankings(in which case anything more then 10 is too much). the #25 p4p guy is probably no less then a #5 on the divisional ranking.

The longer p4p lists also help show the more dominant divisions overall.

Yo I have been playing around with divisional top 25s and even UFC and non-UFC top tens, respectively.

I wouldn't mind 20 for a p4p list. 25 wouldn't be too bad but 20 should be enough for now. If we find we are excluding a few deserving cats simply because they don't quite fit into the top 20 then we can always expand but a top 20 would be a nice start.

GDPofDRC wrote:

I remember that. Don't remember if I listed in it though. When I get to making a rank for all of the divisions I would like to make a p4p.

This was a pretty terrible post.

I guess I'm in the minority then. I just think that 20 is too much, 25 P4P is way too much. I guess I like top 10 because it is a pretty exclusive list. I can get into top 15 because like I said #11-15 are just the next line of fighters about to crack top 10. After that though I don't want to see so many names thrown out there on P4P list. I think it waters it down, I like the exclusive list.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Yo I have been playing around with divisional top 25s and even UFC and non-UFC top tens, respectively.

Dag, I find top tens in most weight classes to be very difficult. I just don't see enough of most of the guys.

OUSOONERSOU wrote:

I guess I'm in the minority then. I just think that 20 is too much, 25 P4P is way too much. I guess I like top 10 because it is a pretty exclusive list. I can get into top 15 because like I said #11-15 are just the next line of fighters about to crack top 10. After that though I don't want to see so many names thrown out there on P4P list. I think it waters it down, I like the exclusive list.

But a top ten list still exists within a top 20.

captain organic wrote:

OUSOONERSOU wrote:

I guess I'm in the minority then. I just think that 20 is too much, 25 P4P is way too much. I guess I like top 10 because it is a pretty exclusive list. I can get into top 15 because like I said #11-15 are just the next line of fighters about to crack top 10. After that though I don't want to see so many names thrown out there on P4P list. I think it waters it down, I like the exclusive list.

But a top ten list still exists within a top 20.

ha ha yes I know this, I'm just saying I don't think anyone's #20 should be mentioned in a P4P sentence, honorable mention at best. Making a top 10 is fun to me. I won't enjoy the top 20 nearly as much. I just don't think it means as much. I'm not really that interested in who people think is the #16-25 P4P fighters in the world.

SOONERS, the top 17 fighter for instance though, is probably someone higher up on someone elses list, and is a fight or a round removed or away from the top 10.


Just try it out partnah.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

SOONERS, the top 17 fighter for instance though, is probably someone higher up on someone elses list, and is a fight or a round removed or away from the top 10.


Just try it out partnah.

I don't have any problems giving it a try. It's not a big deal I was just giving my opinion on what I preffer. I just wanted to throw out there that I like the small list, it's fun and it means more IMO. But like I said I have no problem giving it a try, just like I said wanted to get my 2 cents out there.

top 20 is more interesting, I like seeing where people have guys outside the top 10