Ninja's Place Fantasy Baseball League

Yeah it is what it is, but I don't think it's veto worthy

Bigs I'll give u Bartlett, Hughes and that closer I just got for Pedroia

tolivendiewithLA wrote:

Bigs I'll give u Bartlett, Hughes and that closer I just got for Pedroia

I'm about to crash, let me sleep on it.

what trade? I didnt even see it .. we dont get to vote on trades? ..

Oggy offered to me

Miggy and Mike Gonzalez (closer Balt.)

Cruz, Konerko and Lindstrom

I accepted

I thought it was a good trade for me and not so for Oggy, but it's not soo lopsided that it's veto worthy.

That's for those players

well he's getting a top 15 player, im getting a mid round outfielder. I did want Jurjens in the trade but obviously made a mistake, so i can live with it if you guys dont want to change it but i think it would be fair if Jurjens got thrown into the deal. Even then it's still a steal for LA.

tolivendiewithLA wrote:

Oggy offered to me

Miggy and Mike Gonzalez (closer Balt.)

Cruz, Konerko and Lindstrom

I accepted

I thought it was a good trade for me and not so for Oggy, but it's not soo lopsided that it's veto worthy.

I definetly wouldnt have veto'd if it was a trade... but oggy is saying this isnt the trade that he meant to do.. I mean if I accidently hit accept when I meant to hit decline because some other shit was going on that was distracting me at the time .. its final? I cant go on here and be like "Hey I didnt mean to do that please dont take that trade."

I say no... but I dunno what really went down cuz you say he offered it twice?

The trade is still pending and I'm leaving it that way for a few days just in case people want to log complaints about unfairness. You should be able to view the trade on the league page and I'm guessing you should've gotten an email when the trade was accepted by LA.

You may not like the trade, but it isn't veto worthy, hell it was proposed to me

Konerko 2-run Hr

Cruz 3-run Hr

it was proposed twice because when i hit "send trade" it froze and i hit it again so it went through twice. I mean adding jurjens to the deal would be fair imo, but if you guys say no then i accept that. I mean i sent you a couple trade offers that you rejected and they all had jurjens in it, so it's not like im just making this up as an excuse, i did want jurjens in the deal and i guess i just forgot to add him to the trade.

So Oggy, I was lookin at soem other potential trades between me and you, interested in Hill or Cano, I'll give you some good offers, any chance ud trade either guy?

so you're not gonna budge on this huh?

Dude what the fuck are u doing Bigs, that isn't a veto worthy trade at all, I'm not the one who made a mistake, but ur still getting players good enough to not make it vetoable. Why did you wait till the mintue it would get processed, Shitty ass commishing.

tolivendiewithLA wrote:

Dude what the fuck are u doing Bigs, that isn't a veto worthy trade at all, I'm not the one who made a mistake, but ur still getting players good enough to not make it vetoable. Why did you wait till the mintue it would get processed, Shitty ass commishing.

Just trying to be fair. I believe that Oggy genuinely meant to include Jurrjens. See my other post. If something like this happens again I won't veto again.