SOKO Black Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : The Dragon, Kenflo, Hendo, Guida, Ace, Wand, Cain, Carwin, Foreman, Evander, Oscar Posts : 3362 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 43 Location : atlanta
| Subject: Re: Nate vs. Miller winner to get a title shot ? Thu May 03, 2012 9:08 am | |
| losing at 170 counts imo not to mention he got man handled at 170 and a win against a washed up gomi and a win over cerrone doesnt cut it for a shot and Im a fan.
Miller needs another solid win imo after diaz | |
|
Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Nate vs. Miller winner to get a title shot ? Thu May 03, 2012 10:17 am | |
| The same people saying Diaz's work at 170 has nothing to do with 155 also agree with the following.
Hendo has no business fighting Anderson since he's 2-2 in his last 4 MW fights.
Anderson shouldn't fight Bones since he's only 2-0 at LHW and hasn't fought there in years.
Shields should be able to have a MW title shot whenever he wants since he hasn't lost at MW in forever and has beaten Hendo most recently. | |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Nate vs. Miller winner to get a title shot ? Thu May 03, 2012 10:34 am | |
| - Ludo wrote:
- freakzilla wrote:
- Ludo wrote:
- freakzilla wrote:
- Miller just lost to Bendo. If Bendo is still champ then Miller shouldn't get the title shot.
And the only reason Miller didn't get his shot before fighting Bendo was because of two instant rematches. That has nothing to do with the fact that Bendo dominated him. Anyway, he has never beaten a top 10 fighter. He has never deserved a title shot. Yet you had him in your top ten before the Bendo fight. Just because you're in the top 10 doesn't mean you deserve a title shot. |
|
Ludo Bronze Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : The Prodigy, The Great, Viking Dahmer, The Phenom Posts : 6474 Join date : 2009-09-12
| Subject: Re: Nate vs. Miller winner to get a title shot ? Thu May 03, 2012 1:50 pm | |
| - freakzilla wrote:
- Ludo wrote:
- freakzilla wrote:
- Ludo wrote:
- freakzilla wrote:
- Miller just lost to Bendo. If Bendo is still champ then Miller shouldn't get the title shot.
And the only reason Miller didn't get his shot before fighting Bendo was because of two instant rematches. That has nothing to do with the fact that Bendo dominated him. Anyway, he has never beaten a top 10 fighter. He has never deserved a title shot. Yet you had him in your top ten before the Bendo fight. Just because you're in the top 10 doesn't mean you deserve a title shot. Then how does someone who never beat a top 10 fighter get into the top ten? | |
|
Ludo Bronze Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : The Prodigy, The Great, Viking Dahmer, The Phenom Posts : 6474 Join date : 2009-09-12
| Subject: Re: Nate vs. Miller winner to get a title shot ? Thu May 03, 2012 1:58 pm | |
| - Farmer1906 wrote:
- The same people saying Diaz's work at 170 has nothing to do with 155 also agree with the following.
Hendo has no business fighting Anderson since he's 2-2 in his last 4 MW fights.
Anderson shouldn't fight Bones since he's only 2-0 at LHW and hasn't fought there in years.
Shields should be able to have a MW title shot whenever he wants since he hasn't lost at MW in forever and has beaten Hendo most recently. Hendo's case is unique. He's coming off wins against an all time great and the guy who remains the biggest legend to date. For those two performances he gets to write his own ticket. Anderson is a Champion, superfights are always good business. Shields shouldn't get an instant title shot because he hasn't competed at Middleweight in quite a while. How he performed elsewhere isn't the issue, the fact that he did is. | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Nate vs. Miller winner to get a title shot ? | |
| |
|