If the election was tomorrow, who would you vote for?

dont trust what the media say about who the front runners are. They are disconnected from the people. Paul is winning a ton of straw polls, and always does well in most valid online polls. The poll on the CBS website about who won the debate shows Ron Paul in 1st by a fairly large margin.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57323832/who-won-the-gop-debate-take-our-poll/

oggy420 wrote:

dont trust what the media say about who the front runners are. They are disconnected from the people. Paul is winning a ton of straw polls, and always does well in most valid online polls. The poll on the CBS website about who won the debate shows Ron Paul in 1st by a fairly large margin.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57323832/who-won-the-gop-debate-take-our-poll/

Oggy,

I haven't been following close enough yet, but do you know if RP will run indepentant when he doesn't win the nomination?

well, he has said that he doesn't want to. Several times. But a lot of his supporters think that he might. Im not really sure right now but honestly i think if he is snubbed and left off the ticket he might run as a libertarian.

I mean u have to be kidding with this guy



what is it about bumbling idiots that so endears them to the republican party?

I know in the heat of politics name calling can get out of hand, but this guy is seriously an idiot.

Then there is ole Hermy

Republican party is straight comedy.

oggy420 wrote:

dont trust what the media say about who the front runners are. They are disconnected from the people. Paul is winning a ton of straw polls, and always does well in most valid online polls. The poll on the CBS website about who won the debate shows Ron Paul in 1st by a fairly large margin.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57323832/who-won-the-gop-debate-take-our-poll/

u mean like this?

though the poll is up now, and guess who won?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57323832/who-won-the-gop-debate-take-our-poll/

Ron Paul is tied for 1st with Cain in iowa and gaining ground and currently 2nd in New Hampshire. I dont think anyone can say he doesn't have a chance anymore.

ron paul has the lead in the iowa primary poll, 2nd but gaining ground in New Hampshire, and dominated the debate last night, made Romney look pretty dumb too which i guess isn't that hard really...

imagine what his numbers would look like if there wasn't a media bias against him....

oggy420 wrote:

ron paul has the lead in the iowa primary poll, 2nd but gaining ground in New Hampshire, and dominated the debate last night, made Romney look pretty dumb too which i guess isn't that hard really...

imagine what his numbers would look like if there wasn't a media bias against him....

I have to watch the debate, but I don't see Romney as dumb. Looks nothing like a conservative, but he doesn't look dumb imo.

he is. he knows nothing about economics. or foreign policy either really.

PAUL VS. ROMNEY: TWEETS FROM LAST NIGHT
Here’s what a few various pundits had to say about Ron Paul and Mitt Romney’s disagreement during last night’s debate concerning whether there are any actual “cuts” to military spending in the wake of the failure of the Deficit Supercommittee:

Former RNC Chairman Michael Steele: “Romney looked a little piqued at Ron Paul on the budget. I think Ron knows what he’s talking about.”

Red State’s Erick Erickson: “Ron Paul actually gets a great comeback at Mitt Romney and actually shows he knows more about the budget than Romney on this point. Wow.”

Talk radio host Neal Boortz: “Go get ‘em Ron Paul! They aren’t cutting anything out of anything. Base-line budgeting. So right.”

CNN’s Roland Martin: “Rep. Ron Paul just schooled Mitt Romney on what’s happening on Capitol Hill. Paul is there. Mitt isn’t. Who do you trust?”

Washington Examiner/American Spectator’s Philip Klein: “Ron Paul smart to turn military cuts question into general rant about how Congress never actually cuts spending.”

MSNBC’s Howard Fineman: “Ron Paul is dominating this debate! ‘They are not cutting anything out of anything.’ He’s right, of course.”

Michelle Bachman or Herman Cain.

Ali wrote:

Michelle Bachman or Herman Cain.

Oh I see, internal sabotage is your game.

Loving this guy more and more.

captain organic wrote:

Ali wrote:

Michelle Bachman or Herman Cain.

Oh I see, internal sabotage is your game.

Not true, Cain is a fast decisive candidate.

Paul's campaign going on the offensive.


More related to Oggy's overall thoughts on the media's handling of Paul:

Was watching meet the press, and they are talking Mitt and Newt all show, mostly Newt and how he seems to be making a move, then in the final minute the host asks a question about Paul, how he is basically tied in NH, and the only guy who got a shot to answer, who was from the National Review(a conservative mag) and instead of answering he goes back to a topic about Newt that they were discussing earlier. Show over.

dude i can't believe people are actually jumping on the Newt wagon. Newt Gingrich? are you serious? All you have to do is google this prick to see that he is scum. Cheat on and divorce your wife while she is dying with cancer type of scum. Insider trading type of scum. Got lots of money from the Fannie and Freddie bailouts that he was carrying on about in the debates type of scum.

All i can do to the lame-stream medias agenda to push everyone and anyone but Ron Paul is face-palm at this point.