| | Nate Diaz |  |
|
+10oggy420 captain organic GDPofDRC Cu Bu Bigs03 redvexx8 bobbitt15 KingsOwn19 acccardinal12 LA 14 posters |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
oggy420
Bronze Belt
Posts : 6483
Join date : 2009-07-15
Age : 35
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:03 pm | |
| I've been calling for a Nick Diaz vs Carlos Condit fight for a while, but i can settle for Nate vs Condit. | |
|
| | |
LA
Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva, Jose Aldo
Posts : 15046
Join date : 2009-07-15
Age : 37
Location : Boston, Mass and Los Angeles, California
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:56 pm | |
| Nick would destroy Condit, Nate is a much better fight, I'll take Nate | |
|
| | |
oggy420
Bronze Belt
Posts : 6483
Join date : 2009-07-15
Age : 35
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:17 am | |
| yea but this is back when Nick Diaz got little to no respect from the majority of people on this board. Now i agree Nick would beat Condit but it might be a better fight then you think, i think Condit is game. | |
|
| | |
Bigs03
Black Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Fedor and GSP
Posts : 3124
Join date : 2009-07-16
Age : 44
Location : Houston, TX
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:17 pm | |
| - tolivendiewithLA wrote:
- Nick would destroy Condit, Nate is a much better fight, I'll take Nate
Nick wouldn't destroy Condit. You have an inflated view of a lot of fighters. | |
|
| | |
LA
Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva, Jose Aldo
Posts : 15046
Join date : 2009-07-15
Age : 37
Location : Boston, Mass and Los Angeles, California
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:57 pm | |
| - Bigs03 wrote:
- tolivendiewithLA wrote:
- Nick would destroy Condit, Nate is a much better fight, I'll take Nate
Nick wouldn't destroy Condit. You have an inflated view of a lot of fighters. Yet I end up being right so often Nick literally owns Condit everywhere that fight goes And that's a pretty hypocritical statement based on your views of Mir | |
|
| | |
captain organic
Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730
Join date : 2009-07-15
Location : NJ
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:16 pm | |
| I have either Diaz brother beating up Condit. | |
|
| | |
Bigs03
Black Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Fedor and GSP
Posts : 3124
Join date : 2009-07-16
Age : 44
Location : Houston, TX
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:17 pm | |
| - tolivendiewithLA wrote:
- Bigs03 wrote:
- tolivendiewithLA wrote:
- Nick would destroy Condit, Nate is a much better fight, I'll take Nate
Nick wouldn't destroy Condit. You have an inflated view of a lot of fighters.
Yet I end up being right so often
Nick literally owns Condit everywhere that fight goes
And that's a pretty hypocritical statement based on your views of Mir I see no reason to think that Nick Diaz would destroy Condit. As far as my views on Frank Mir? He's a top 10...probably closer to top 5 HW in the world. Most people agree that he has skills and is one of the best in the world at HW. If you or anyone else thinks he's a d-bag that's fine, it's a matter of opinion. However, whether he's a great HW fighter and highly ranked in the world is not opinion at all. | |
|
| | |
LA
Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva, Jose Aldo
Posts : 15046
Join date : 2009-07-15
Age : 37
Location : Boston, Mass and Los Angeles, California
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:43 pm | |
| Nick is better than Condit everywhere that fights goes, hell I think Nate would beat Condit at 170.
And you think Mir is better than myself or some others, that's how that relates, you said I have an inflated view of fighters, and I basically said you have the same thing for Mir. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Nate Diaz | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Nate Diaz | |
|
