Mayweather wants more money

Birdofthad wrote:

no i was saying he was the undisputed man at welter

Yeah but I know and you know you were trying to make that a good win and its not. LOL

ya your right sooners becoming the undisputed welterweight champion isnt impressive at all

Birdofthad wrote:

ya your right sooners becoming the undisputed welterweight champion isnt impressive at all

So you are saying that the Bali win was impressive? Is that what I am hearing Bird?

ya go ahead and tell me how unimpressive being undisputed champ is have fun being alone on an island , but I guess your used to it by know with the Allan Green love

it was a good win

but impressive? LOLOLOLOL

Birdofthad wrote:

ya go ahead and tell me how unimpressive being undisputed champ is have fun being alone on an island , but I guess your used to it by know with the Allan Green love

LOL Ok Bird tell me are you impressed with the win over Baldi?

BTW leave Green out of this them is fightin words.

gomez1012 wrote:

it was a good win

but impressive? LOLOLOLOL

I agree its nothing like when Green will KO Ward in 8.

what do you call beating the undisputed welterweight champ and whitewashing him 12-0 ?

if thats your stance then I hope you shit all over Holyfield beating Buster Douglas as well
you like putting words in my hands (not mouth) as i never said it was impressive i said he was the champ

balidi win was expected and not a glory win..floyd won that night the REAL welter title the lineal one but he was not undisputed per commisions since baldi did not pay one fee for a belt when he fought judah..leon spinks was also the REAL champ..billy backus was the undesputed real champ years ago..im not impressed.stuff happens lol.

soonermark890 wrote:

gomez1012 wrote:

it was a good win

but impressive? LOLOLOLOL

I agree its nothing like when Green will get KO'd by Ward in 8.

fixed

Birdofthad wrote:

what do you call beating the undisputed welterweight champ and whitewashing him 12-0 ?

if thats your stance then I hope you shit all over Holyfield beating Buster Douglas as well
you like putting words in my hands (not mouth) as i never said it was impressive i said he was the champ

again, i'd call it a good win, nothing impressive

Like Dmar said, expected, just like all of his other so called notable wins in recent years

Gatti, Zab, Hatton, Oscar, even Shane

Floyd beats Zab and Baldi the 2 men with claims to the title, he drops 4 rounds out of 24 at worst

Birdofthad wrote:

Floyd beats Zab and Baldi the 2 men with claims to the title, he drops 4 rounds out of 24 at worst

good wins, impressive? not really

Huge favorite to win both

i never said they were impressive in a past thread Sooners couldnt admit those made the undisputed man in the division and somehow tried to twist this into me masterbating to these wins as if they were the 2nd coming of Allah

Back to the topic gentlemen, why do you guys think Floyd is doing this? Cause he honestly feels he deserves the bigger split or just being a dick like always?

lol..yes the first win made him the real champ the second one undisputed in anyones eyes..thats fact.

Money is waht Money May is all about

i love how Arum isnt going to negotiate in the press and then what does he do

yahtzee dmar

Birdofthad wrote:

what do you call beating the undisputed welterweight champ and whitewashing him 12-0 ?

if thats your stance then I hope you shit all over Holyfield beating Buster Douglas as well
you like putting words in my hands (not mouth) as i never said it was impressive i said he was the champ

That's not a good win either. Buster? Come on Bird.

Its ok either way Floyd is a great fighter.

freddie1437 wrote:

Back to the topic gentlemen, why do you guys think Floyd is doing this? Cause he honestly feels he deserves the bigger split or just being a dick like always?

that one

i think he feels he deserves a bigger split..ill agree with him but no more than 52-48 if hes looking for 60-40 or more hes out of line and even he knows that but publicaly wont admitt it..hey if this is 80 milklion for two guys why not 25 mill apeace and the left over 30 goes to the winner..ill bet pac says ok .will floyd.

Birdofthad wrote:

Money is waht Money May is all about

i love how Arum isnt going to negotiate in the press and then what does he do

They all fucking suck they just need to sign and fight

Birdofthad wrote:

sorry Floyds constantly outsold Pac like it or not

Mayweather's the bigger draw and its not a shock he is a loud abrasive american compared to a quiet phillipino guy who likes to sing 80s karaoke

I'm not challenging this view. However, my thinking is, it's not feasible to comapre, Pacquaio vs. Clottey to Mayweather vs. Mosley. You have Pac fighting a relative unknown and Mayweather fighting a star. Now this is where is gets confusing. All through MWs career, he's had to fight a star to generate the PPV numbers you guys are talking about. However, some are saying that Floyd's numbers are higher vs Pacs when considering common opponents. I don't know if that's accurate, however even if it is, we must also consider Pacquiao - Cotto as a big influence on negotiations. By the time he fought Cotto, Pac's popularity was gaining great momentum based on his wins over De La Hoya and Hatton. The numbers of the Cotto fight ( a fighter who defeated Mosley) vs. the numbers of the Mayweather - Mosley fight are by far the most important factors when negotiating purses for this fight (My opinion.). I doubt they justify a 60-40 split in Mayweather's favor, however if they do, I'd like to see the numbers. If the numbers justify it, so it is.

yes fight or have a duel with colt 45 s at 5 paces and floyd sr can give floyd the meth so the bullets bounch off him..after all we want to level the playing field BS..

I agree with you Frank, I think you have to compare PBF vs Mosley to Pac vs Cotto and you will see that the numbers are extremely close 1.4 to 1.25. Best scenario would be 52-48 and if Pac feels really generous then 55-45, but 60-40 isn't going to get the fight made!