The Super Four HW tournament.

The super four HW tournament. Think Showtimes super six, but featuring MMA's version of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

Group stages; 1 point awarded for a draw, 2 for a victory, 3 for a KO or submission. M-1, UFC and Strikeforce co-promote these shows in the USA on PPV, network TV and Showtime.

The top two scorers then rematch for the title. If the finalists are 1-1 over the tournament, an automatic rubber match will be scheduled.

Stage 1 Brock vs Fedor(KO), Carwin vs Overeem(sub)

Stage 2 Carwin(KO) vs Fedor, Overeem(KO) vs Brock

Stage 3 Overeem vs Fedor(TKO), Brock(dec) vs Carwin

Finals round 1 - Fedor vs Overeem(KO)

Finals round 2 - Fedor(dec) vs Overeem.

Fedor wins the tournament and is knocked out twice according to my computer simulation.

My computer simulation says size matters

My computer simulation says I am a GAY WOMAN!

Rosie?

how the hell do you have a computer simulation,???

I divide by zero all the time.

Wolfy, how would you see a Overeem vs JDS fight going? Just curious.

I see it ending in a knockout with a rippling muscled man KOing another ripplingly muscled man.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

I see it ending in a knockout with a rippling muscled man KOing another ripplingly muscled man.

Who would be getting KO'd? Or which one do you think is more likely to get KO'd in that fight?

bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:

My computer simulation says I am a GAY WOMAN!

Okay Wolf or LA who did the joke wrong and edited it? That was a fair joke! lol not cool!

I've done this fight in the half dozen other threads about the four HW champions.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

I've done this fight in the half dozen other threads about the four HW champions.

Is that your answer to my question?

ugh, the long answer to my question is the fight is an interesting matchup that looks even on paper, but I think of JDS and how he'd likely lose badly in K1, so then I wonder if Overeem is significantly better, but then I think I've seen how much easier it is to find Overeem's off button, so I have no clear prediction.

Short answer is I've said all this a bunch of times.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

ugh, the long answer to my question is the fight is an interesting matchup that looks even on paper, but I think of JDS and how he'd likely lose badly in K1, so then I wonder if Overeem is significantly better, but then I think I've seen how much easier it is to find Overeem's off button, so I have to clear prediction.

Short answer is I've said all this a bunch of times.

Thanks for your patenience Wolf. I really can't remember what you said on the subject before although I do recall you talking about it in the past. Anyways thanks for the recap.

lol if wolf answered a question directly it would shock me, just like his explanation of tito as #2 LHW ever. It vague and doesnt answer or defend the agonist point of view. Long story short wolf may be a politician

cu bua I answered your question. Tito has a huge slate of awesome wins and holds the LHW title defense record. You and I simply disagree on the quality of his wins, because you are bias against him personally and look to assassinate his career and his victories with arbitrary qualifiers like "who did he finish" and ignorance to the talent he fought earlier in his career. Because Tanner who had success at HW most of his career before the Ortiz fight also had success at MW later you look to penalize Ortiz, and other silly things along those lines. If I failed to answer any of your questions it would have been because the question wasn't really valid in the first place thus not really requiring a justifying response.

Hope that clears things up buddy!

no it doesnt clear things up, You say I am bias cause I disagree with you that in itself is ignorance.

FTR I trained with Tanner and respect him as a fighter

I just thought you would come a little better than to try to deflect my points and throw jabs like ignorant and bias.

If u think Fedor wins the tourney u need to simulate it a couple more times LOL.

What? What is there to come with? In my literal, honest opinion from my heart of hearts I believe Tito has a great resume with some awesome wins and those who try and break him down aren't thinking as clearly as they could simply because they hate him.

Wolf I am with u I think Tito is 1 of the all time greats I just have a hard time ranking him second if thats where u had him? I think Chuck is ahead of him and also believe Shogun is ahead of him and some of the others are very debateable.

Let Shogun defend the title five times and well talk.

Might not happen anymore because of just how stacked the division is right now.

Wolfgangsta wrote:

What? What is there to come with? Tito has a great resume with some awesome winIn my literal, honest opinion from my heart of hearts I believe s and those who try and break him down aren't thinking as clearly as they could simply because they hate him.

THats an answer I can get down with, You value titos run and honestly believe him to be #2 in your opinion. I grade him lower based on record, his inability to beat people listed in everyone elses top 10 (granted he has a win over wanderlei 10 + years ago) him having 20% of his wins against shamrock, and In my opinion having not faced alot of top 10 alltime talent.

I have liddell and couture ranked and tito just below them and honeslty I have never been a liddell fan at all( i know crazy) couture is a good story but if he ever fought chute box or wand or even a handful of american fighters I would hope he went to sleep. Long story short I dont like tito but I dont hate tito. Its meh for me, I know his persona is an act and works well for him. He is a smart business man and a good pioneer for effective GNP.