captain organic
Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730
Join date : 2009-07-15
Location : NJ
 | | Subject: Rogers Overeem not for the title? Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:56 pm | |
| I get that they feel weird giving Rogers a title shot ahead of Fedor after he just lost to Fedor. But won't it look alot worse if Rogers beats the champ, yet Overeem will then go defend it somewhere else?
WTF does Overeem have over these guys? He never fights, and then when he does, it's not for the title. I really like the fight, but the whole situation is very poorly played. | |
|
acccardinal12
Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Cung Le, BJ Penn, Mayhem, Chael Sonnen, Anthony Pettis
Posts : 10925
Join date : 2009-12-04
Age : 48
Location : Kentuckiana
| | Subject: Re: Rogers Overeem not for the title? Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:38 pm | |
| | |
|
OU
Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Diaz Bros, Wandy, Ace, Hendo, JDS, Lima Bros,Uncle Creepy, long live Iceman
Posts : 43280
Join date : 2009-07-15
Age : 38
Location : Lawton, Oklahoma
| | Subject: Re: Rogers Overeem not for the title? Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:40 pm | |
| I wonder if they will just strip Overeem's title if he loses this fight. Because really if he loses then neither guy deserves to have the belt. | |
|
GDPofDRC
Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Shogun, Fedor, Wand, Saku, Hendo, BJ, Bas, Cain, Mike Vallely
Posts : 21274
Join date : 2009-08-04
Age : 105
Location : Fresyes, CA
| | Subject: Re: Rogers Overeem not for the title? Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:51 pm | |
| It would make so much more sense for him to rematch Werdum and for the Title. It will be over 30 months with that title never once being defended if he fights a non title fight in the spring. | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Rogers Overeem not for the title? | |
| |
|
