| Munoz vs Weidman | |
|
+5Ludo KingsOwn19 Farmer1906 oggy420 Ninja 9 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Ninja Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Anyone with the last name Rua or Emelianenko and Uncle Creepy Posts : 3831 Join date : 2009-07-15
| Subject: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:37 am | |
| | |
|
| |
oggy420 Bronze Belt
Posts : 6483 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:11 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:28 pm | |
| Everyone called it because Weidman was the only guy left. |
|
| |
Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:31 pm | |
| - Ali wrote:
- Everyone called it because Weidman was the only guy left.
Prove it | |
|
| |
KingsOwn19 Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva,Dan Henderson, Emelianenko Fedor, Josh Barnett Posts : 12421 Join date : 2009-07-16 Location : Northern California
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:10 pm | |
| Not high on Munoz, but he should beat Weidman. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:49 pm | |
| - Farmer1906 wrote:
- Ali wrote:
- Everyone called it because Weidman was the only guy left.
Prove it All the top Middleweights have fights scheduled, once Bisping vs. Barbarian was set Weidman was the only guy left for Munoz. |
|
| |
Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:34 pm | |
| - Ali wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- Ali wrote:
- Everyone called it because Weidman was the only guy left.
Prove it All the top Middleweights have fights scheduled, once Bisping vs. Barbarian was set Weidman was the only guy left for Munoz. Okami & Stann aren't booked either I don't believe. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:41 pm | |
| - Farmer1906 wrote:
- Ali wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- Ali wrote:
- Everyone called it because Weidman was the only guy left.
Prove it All the top Middleweights have fights scheduled, once Bisping vs. Barbarian was set Weidman was the only guy left for Munoz. Okami & Stann aren't booked either I don't believe. Silva doesn't usually like to make fights between a winner and loser so Okami is unlikely, and Stann is facing Alessio. |
|
| |
Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:47 pm | |
| - Ali wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- Ali wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- Ali wrote:
- Everyone called it because Weidman was the only guy left.
Prove it All the top Middleweights have fights scheduled, once Bisping vs. Barbarian was set Weidman was the only guy left for Munoz. Okami & Stann aren't booked either I don't believe. Silva doesn't usually like to make fights between a winner and loser so Okami is unlikely, and Stann is facing Alessio. Still I only saw Ninja actually call it. | |
|
| |
Ludo Bronze Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : The Prodigy, The Great, Viking Dahmer, The Phenom Posts : 6474 Join date : 2009-09-12
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:10 pm | |
| Still you just got told by a Scotsman. | |
|
| |
Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:14 pm | |
| - Ludo wrote:
- Still you just got told by a Scotsman.
I was told nothing. Ali is wrong, like usual. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:18 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Ludo Bronze Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : The Prodigy, The Great, Viking Dahmer, The Phenom Posts : 6474 Join date : 2009-09-12
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:17 pm | |
| I don't see how he's wrong when his point is valid. Silva doesn't match winners with losers and everyone else is pretty much booked up. Anderson is fighting Chael, Bisping is fighting Boetsch, Maia vacated the division and lost his last fight, Okami lost his last two fights, Vitor is matched with Wanderlei after TUF Brazil, Stann is matched with Sakara and coming off a loss. The rest of the top ten is outside of the UFC. Who else was Munoz supposed to fight? | |
|
| |
Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:22 pm | |
| They could have easily brought someone from SF, matched up winner versus loser which isn't a rule, had him wait for Leben, or had him fight a lower tier guy. Once again Ninja called it well before any of these bookings. | |
|
| |
Ludo Bronze Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : The Prodigy, The Great, Viking Dahmer, The Phenom Posts : 6474 Join date : 2009-09-12
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:01 pm | |
| Munoz just beat Leben, nobody has been brought from Strikeforce yet to fill in the gaps and the Strikeforce Middleweight division other than Jacare, Kennedy, and Rockhold suck. So again, who else was Munoz supposed to fight? | |
|
| |
bobbitt15 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Chael Sonnen, Michael Chandler, Jorge Masvidal, Carlos Condit Posts : 14830 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 35 Location : Cincinnati
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:12 pm | |
| The winner/winner, loser/loser is pretty much a rule despite the matchups most of the posters on here seem to make | |
|
| |
GDPofDRC Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Shogun, Fedor, Wand, Saku, Hendo, BJ, Bas, Cain, Mike Vallely Posts : 21274 Join date : 2009-08-04 Age : 105 Location : Fresyes, CA
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:37 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:41 pm | |
| - bobbitt15 wrote:
- The winner/winner, loser/loser is pretty much a rule despite the matchups most of the posters on here seem to make
Joe should alter it in some cases, not every loss is devastating and not every win is convincing. |
|
| |
GDPofDRC Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Shogun, Fedor, Wand, Saku, Hendo, BJ, Bas, Cain, Mike Vallely Posts : 21274 Join date : 2009-08-04 Age : 105 Location : Fresyes, CA
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:49 pm | |
| - Ali wrote:
- bobbitt15 wrote:
- The winner/winner, loser/loser is pretty much a rule despite the matchups most of the posters on here seem to make
Joe should alter it in some cases, not every loss is devastating and not every win is convincing. I agree. | |
|
| |
bobbitt15 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Chael Sonnen, Michael Chandler, Jorge Masvidal, Carlos Condit Posts : 14830 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 35 Location : Cincinnati
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:22 pm | |
| - Ali wrote:
- bobbitt15 wrote:
- The winner/winner, loser/loser is pretty much a rule despite the matchups most of the posters on here seem to make
Joe should alter it in some cases, not every loss is devastating and not every win is convincing. Sometimes he does ie Bisping-Boetsch, but those cases should be very few and far between | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:26 pm | |
| - bobbitt15 wrote:
- Ali wrote:
- bobbitt15 wrote:
- The winner/winner, loser/loser is pretty much a rule despite the matchups most of the posters on here seem to make
Joe should alter it in some cases, not every loss is devastating and not every win is convincing. Sometimes he does ie Bisping-Boetsch, but those cases should be very few and far between Good point I keep forgetting Mike's coming off a loss. |
|
| |
bobbitt15 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Chael Sonnen, Michael Chandler, Jorge Masvidal, Carlos Condit Posts : 14830 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 35 Location : Cincinnati
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:28 pm | |
| Interesting fight. Weidman with a full camp to work with and a really sneak sub game. Wouldn't be surprised if he slipped a choke on Munoz at some point | |
|
| |
GDPofDRC Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Shogun, Fedor, Wand, Saku, Hendo, BJ, Bas, Cain, Mike Vallely Posts : 21274 Join date : 2009-08-04 Age : 105 Location : Fresyes, CA
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:30 pm | |
| I'm assuming this is the number one contender fight. Munoz and Weidman both hold the longest current win streaks in the division after one Anderson Silva.
The winner of Palhares vs Belchar would be at 4 MW wins in a row as would Bostech when he embarrasses Bisping.
New contenders are finally emerging. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:33 pm | |
| - GDPofDRC wrote:
- I'm assuming this is the number one contender fight. Munoz and Weidman both hold the longest current win streaks in the division after one Anderson Silva.
I wouldn't be surprised if Mike gets the next shot, assuming he gets by The Barbarian. |
|
| |
Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:40 pm | |
| - Ali wrote:
- GDPofDRC wrote:
- I'm assuming this is the number one contender fight. Munoz and Weidman both hold the longest current win streaks in the division after one Anderson Silva.
I wouldn't be surprised if Mike gets the next shot, assuming he gets by The Barbarian. I doubt it since he'd be on a 1 fight win streak. I still think he meets up with Franklin in the fall. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Munoz vs Weidman | |
| |
|
| |
| Munoz vs Weidman | |
|