MMA RANKINGS - CHAPTER 2...

The outliers would have been from LA's ridiculous rankings that thankfully were omitted.

It was almost as big as Repgate.

What do we call the boxing fiasco? Phallasgate?

Moses-gate.

So are we going to have our own history sticky explaining every "Gate" that has happened here?

Ya -

DHN/reedgate ; wolf ran them off ESPN's board.

repgate ; wolf ran LA off the board.

boxing gate ; wolf ran soonermark, who took the rest of the boxing homos with him off the board.

Sound about right?

Lollllllllllllllllllllllll

Being called a Wolfy - biggest insult you can give another poster on the board

LA faked his rep, arghh I have to come up with some reasoning why he has the highest rep, I'll also create other accounts ah ha!

LA wrote:

Being called a Wolfy - biggest insult you can give another poster on the board

LA faked his rep, arghh I have to come up with some reasoning why he has the highest rep, I'll also create other accounts ah ha!

Sad. Just sad. LA you need some pussy or something bro. So high strung.

Cause I found you to be a complete asshole, therefore I'll post accordingly

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Ya -

DHN/reedgate ; wolf ran them off ESPN's board.

repgate ; wolf ran LA off the board.

boxing gate ; wolf ran soonermark, who took the rest of the boxing homos with him off the board.

Sound about right?

Wonder whatever happened to this homo?

timthebim wrote:

Wolfgangsta wrote:

Ya -

DHN/reedgate ; wolf ran them off ESPN's board.

repgate ; wolf ran LA off the board.

boxing gate ; wolf ran soonermark, who took the rest of the boxing homos with him off the board.

Sound about right?

Wonder whatever happened to this homo?

I heard he changed his name to Tim.

Lollllllllllllllllllllllllll

LA wrote:

They don't belong, if they did I would say so. 4 possibly 5 SF HWs wouldn't be in my HW rankings if I based things solely off hate for their Organization, Diaz wouldn't be 5/6th, Jacare 5th. My dislike for the Org is obvious and warranted IMO, but after that I simply point out the obvious that the best fighters are in the UFC without question.

Well when u admit u dislike an organization, it's not surprising that u will hold a bias when it comes to rankings.


and what is so crazy about Mo and Cavalcante in the top 10? who should be above them?

People are game in either division sometimes, where a guy just fought or is scheduled to fight next is enough.

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

Leave them as is this time but next time we should make it clear that each fighter is only available for 1 division. If you want next time I'll put up 20 fighters available for each division and people choose 10 out of those 20. 20 should be more than enough.

Don't bother doing that, you get no say on how another person votes if it is within reason, example being someone ranking BJ at Middle Weight as unreasonable.

There's no need to list 20 fighters for people to choose from. There's also no reason to rank any fighters in multiple divisions

Well by the results of this it looks like we do need a list.

Na, just something stating that guys only need to be ranked at the weights they are currently fighting at

The list idea isn't happening.

GDPofDRC wrote:

The list idea isn't happening.

Who the fuck said you make the decisions.

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

GDPofDRC wrote:

The list idea isn't happening.

Who the fuck said you make the decisions.

Ironic statement, don't you think. I'm telling you that you are not going to make decisions for others.

I didn't make decisions dickhead, I made a suggestion.

Another poor one. Thanks for the effort.

Go fuck yourself. That's another suggestion.