Sig

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:27 am

Hey Mark, I think I found you a good one.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:09 am

how u like it?

Guest

OU wrote:: how u like it?

HAHAHA Its scary gay. You know in the gay rape pulp fiction sort of way.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:17 am

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: how u like it?

HAHAHA Its scary gay. You know in the gay rape pulp fiction sort of way.

I figured you would love it. Not sure you hate Nick enough for that to sting. I know how you secretly love Money May so I'm giving u a chance to rep your boy.

Guest

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: how u like it?

HAHAHA Its scary gay. You know in the gay rape pulp fiction sort of way.

I figured you would love it. Not sure you hate Nick enough for that to sting. I know how you secretly love Money May so I'm giving u a chance to rep your boy.

I hate you. LOL

BTW what in the hell is going on with the cowboys.

Also I am moving this to the off topic section.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:36 am

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: how u like it?

HAHAHA Its scary gay. You know in the gay rape pulp fiction sort of way.

I figured you would love it. Not sure you hate Nick enough for that to sting. I know how you secretly love Money May so I'm giving u a chance to rep your boy.

I hate you. LOL

BTW what in the hell is going on with the cowboys.

Also I am moving this to the off topic section.

That is what you get for picking against my boy lol

My Cowboys are really pissing me off, losing games they should win is getting old.

Guest

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: how u like it?

HAHAHA Its scary gay. You know in the gay rape pulp fiction sort of way.

I figured you would love it. Not sure you hate Nick enough for that to sting. I know how you secretly love Money May so I'm giving u a chance to rep your boy.

I hate you. LOL

BTW what in the hell is going on with the cowboys.

Also I am moving this to the off topic section.

That is what you get for picking against my boy lol

My Cowboys are really pissing me off, losing games they should win is getting old.

Im still just not sold on Romo. Also Why in the hell didnt Noons just box and move Diaz?

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:48 am

Maybe the broken jaw and broken hand played a factor in that.

Guest

OU wrote:: Maybe the broken jaw and broken hand played a factor in that.

Could be. LOL BTW I think he will win the next time they fight. Noons is a better boxer but he needs to have a better plan. I think he thought he would just walk in and win.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:48 am

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: Maybe the broken jaw and broken hand played a factor in that.

Could be. LOL BTW I think he will win the next time they fight. Noons is a better boxer but he needs to have a better plan. I think he thought he would just walk in and win.

I'll take Nick if they ever fight again. Nick is just the better overall fighter. His chin is too good and Nick has more ways that he can win the fight.

Guest

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: Maybe the broken jaw and broken hand played a factor in that.

Could be. LOL BTW I think he will win the next time they fight. Noons is a better boxer but he needs to have a better plan. I think he thought he would just walk in and win.

I'll take Nick if they ever fight again. Nick is just the better overall fighter. His chin is too good and Nick has more ways that he can win the fight.

I think if they fight again Noons will come in and Beat him up cut him up and stop him in the second.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:08 pm

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: Maybe the broken jaw and broken hand played a factor in that.

Could be. LOL BTW I think he will win the next time they fight. Noons is a better boxer but he needs to have a better plan. I think he thought he would just walk in and win.

I'll take Nick if they ever fight again. Nick is just the better overall fighter. His chin is too good and Nick has more ways that he can win the fight.

I think if they fight again Noons will come in and Beat him up cut him up and stop him in the second.

He doesn't have the ability to stop Nick without the help of a doctor. He can't KO or TKO him, he can't sub him. He better try to stick and move, it's his only way of winning. Nick is just the better fighter.

Guest

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: Maybe the broken jaw and broken hand played a factor in that.

Could be. LOL BTW I think he will win the next time they fight. Noons is a better boxer but he needs to have a better plan. I think he thought he would just walk in and win.

I'll take Nick if they ever fight again. Nick is just the better overall fighter. His chin is too good and Nick has more ways that he can win the fight.

I think if they fight again Noons will come in and Beat him up cut him up and stop him in the second.

He doesn't have the ability to stop Nick without the help of a doctor. He can't KO or TKO him, he can't sub him. He better try to stick and move, it's his only way of winning. Nick is just the better fighter.

He can hurt Nick and I think he could stop him late without the doctor if Noons sticks and moves and wears him down.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:16 pm

Not possible. Nick doesn't wear down. He has cardio for days and his chin will hold up just fine. Wishful thinking there.

Guest

OU wrote:: Not possible. Nick doesn't wear down. He has cardio for days and his chin will hold up just fine. Wishful thinking there.

Everyone can be wore down. Its not the cardio that would wear him out its his head snapping back 100 times. It wears down your back and your legs.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:59 pm

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: Not possible. Nick doesn't wear down. He has cardio for days and his chin will hold up just fine. Wishful thinking there.

Everyone can be wore down. Its not the cardio that would wear him out its his head snapping back 100 times. It wears down your back and your legs.

haha won't happen. Triathlon running Nick Diaz will not have tired legs.

Guest

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: Not possible. Nick doesn't wear down. He has cardio for days and his chin will hold up just fine. Wishful thinking there.

Everyone can be wore down. Its not the cardio that would wear him out its his head snapping back 100 times. It wears down your back and your legs.

haha won't happen. Triathlon running Nick Diaz will not have tired legs.

Just wait and see. Punches can take away your legs.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:04 pm

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: Not possible. Nick doesn't wear down. He has cardio for days and his chin will hold up just fine. Wishful thinking there.

Everyone can be wore down. Its not the cardio that would wear him out its his head snapping back 100 times. It wears down your back and your legs.

haha won't happen. Triathlon running Nick Diaz will not have tired legs.

Just wait and see. Punches can take away your legs.

Not when you have the conditioning of Diaz.

Guest

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: Not possible. Nick doesn't wear down. He has cardio for days and his chin will hold up just fine. Wishful thinking there.

Everyone can be wore down. Its not the cardio that would wear him out its his head snapping back 100 times. It wears down your back and your legs.

haha won't happen. Triathlon running Nick Diaz will not have tired legs.

Just wait and see. Punches can take away your legs.

Not when you have the conditioning of Diaz.

I have seen plenty of better conditioned athletes lose their legs in fights because they are getting their heads bashed in.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:07 pm

like who? Who has better conditioning then Nick and lost their legs?

Guest

OU wrote:: like who? Who has better conditioning then Nick and lost their legs?

In Boxing? OK let me see. Cotto, Margo, De La Hoya, Trinidad. Thats just a few let me know if you want me to list 50 more.

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:11 pm

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: like who? Who has better conditioning then Nick and lost their legs?

In Boxing? OK let me see. Cotto, Margo, De La Hoya, Trinidad. Thats just a few let me know if you want me to list 50 more.

What makes you think they have better cardio? Just an educated guess? How many marathon and triathlons a year do the run?

Subject: Re: Sig Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:16 pm

So it is your opinion that all elite boxers have superior cardio to MMA fighters?

Guest

OU wrote:

soonermark890 wrote:

OU wrote:: like who? Who has better conditioning then Nick and lost their legs?

In Boxing? OK let me see. Cotto, Margo, De La Hoya, Trinidad. Thats just a few let me know if you want me to list 50 more.

What makes you think they have better cardio? Just an educated guess? How many marathon and triathlons a year do the run?

What makes you think that Diaz's is better? Because he does marathons? My friends run those too. Are they better conditioned?

I think they have better cardio because they train to fight for more rounds. Any way you slice it they are training to fight for 36 minutes. Diaz is training to fight for 25 min. Just a thought. Its not set in stone I am just saying we have seen guys with great cardio have their legs taken away from punches to the body and punches to the head. It happens and I think it could happen to Diaz.

Guest

OU wrote:: So it is your opinion that all elite boxers have superior cardio to MMA fighters?

NO Its just differnt types.