|
| RU to Big 10.... | |
| | |
Author | Message |
---|
captain organic Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:05 pm | |
| - OU wrote:
- bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:
- Yeah, cause it is the Big 12, not the Big 10.
Yeah and all the other big conferences are growing, can't get left behind. Fuck all the bull shit. Go 14. Or even 16, for that is prob where all the big conferences are going. Might as well go for it now, have your picks of the litter. | |
| | | acccardinal12 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Cung Le, BJ Penn, Mayhem, Chael Sonnen, Anthony Pettis Posts : 10925 Join date : 2009-12-04 Age : 48 Location : Kentuckiana
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:40 pm | |
| - captain organic wrote:
- OU wrote:
- bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:
- Yeah, cause it is the Big 12, not the Big 10.
Yeah and all the other big conferences are growing, can't get left behind. Fuck all the bull shit. Go 14. Or even 16, for that is prob where all the big conferences are going. Might as well go for it now, have your picks of the litter. Yeah and my CARDS are easily the nest puck if the litter over any other school in the nation unless its the SEC they already have UK for the tv market out here. Big 10, big 12, and the ACC should be all over us if they need one two, or three teams ti add. The ACC would be foolish if they chose uconn over us. I think we fit in great with the big 12 and that's where i would like to end up if I had to pick a conference to go too. You still suck asshole for calling us loserville captain. You cut me deep u turncoat! | |
| | | Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:10 pm | |
| What needs to happen.
4 super conferences of 16 (sorry if you get left out, but the top 64 is good enough for me). 4 pods in each conference 4 team tourney for conference champion 4 team playoff of conference champions The conference runner ups play (Pac v B1G in Rose, Big XII v SEC in Sugar, etc...) The 1st round pods losers play (Big XII v SEC in Cotton, SEC v BIG in Capital One, etc...) Maybe have other bowls too, but it doesn't really matter.
| |
| | | acccardinal12 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Cung Le, BJ Penn, Mayhem, Chael Sonnen, Anthony Pettis Posts : 10925 Join date : 2009-12-04 Age : 48 Location : Kentuckiana
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:14 pm | |
| - Farmer1906 wrote:
- What needs to happen.
4 super conferences of 16 (sorry if you get left out, but the top 64 is good enough for me). 4 pods in each conference 4 team tourney for conference champion 4 team playoff of conference champions The conference runner ups play (Pac v B1G in Rose, Big XII v SEC in Sugar, etc...) The 1st round pods losers play (Big XII v SEC in Cotton, SEC v BIG in Capital One, etc...) Maybe have other bowls too, but it doesn't really matter.
This would be awesome honestly and i wouldn't mind some other bowls thrown in for tradition. Idk how that would work out though. Seems like that would throw a wrench in it all. | |
| | | acccardinal12 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Cung Le, BJ Penn, Mayhem, Chael Sonnen, Anthony Pettis Posts : 10925 Join date : 2009-12-04 Age : 48 Location : Kentuckiana
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:17 pm | |
| Maybe a NIT type tournament for 5th and 6th place out of the conferences. Just for the Holiday season I think it would be cool. | |
| | | Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:17 pm | |
| - bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- What needs to happen.
4 super conferences of 16 (sorry if you get left out, but the top 64 is good enough for me). 4 pods in each conference 4 team tourney for conference champion 4 team playoff of conference champions The conference runner ups play (Pac v B1G in Rose, Big XII v SEC in Sugar, etc...) The 1st round pods losers play (Big XII v SEC in Cotton, SEC v BIG in Capital One, etc...) Maybe have other bowls too, but it doesn't really matter.
This would be awesome honestly and i wouldn't mind some other bowls thrown in for tradition. Idk how that would work out though. Seems like that would throw a wrench in it all. There would be 8 bowl games of pod winners/runner ups. It would be nice to see non Big 64 team face non pod winners in a few more bowls. I hate that there are 32 (or more) bowls out there now. | |
| | | acccardinal12 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Cung Le, BJ Penn, Mayhem, Chael Sonnen, Anthony Pettis Posts : 10925 Join date : 2009-12-04 Age : 48 Location : Kentuckiana
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:24 pm | |
| - Farmer1906 wrote:
- bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- What needs to happen.
4 super conferences of 16 (sorry if you get left out, but the top 64 is good enough for me). 4 pods in each conference 4 team tourney for conference champion 4 team playoff of conference champions The conference runner ups play (Pac v B1G in Rose, Big XII v SEC in Sugar, etc...) The 1st round pods losers play (Big XII v SEC in Cotton, SEC v BIG in Capital One, etc...) Maybe have other bowls too, but it doesn't really matter.
This would be awesome honestly and i wouldn't mind some other bowls thrown in for tradition. Idk how that would work out though. Seems like that would throw a wrench in it all. There would be 8 bowl games of pod winners/runner ups.
It would be nice to see non Big 64 team face non pod winners in a few more bowls. U I hate that there are 32 (or more) bowls out there now. I think there are too many bowl games also. I like what you say, but an NIT type tournament would be needed for filler games and money throughout the Holiday season. I like the idea of #5-#6-8th place making an 8 to 16 team tournament. | |
| | | captain organic Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Fri Nov 23, 2012 3:01 pm | |
| - bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:
- captain organic wrote:
- OU wrote:
- bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:
- Yeah, cause it is the Big 12, not the Big 10.
Yeah and all the other big conferences are growing, can't get left behind. Fuck all the bull shit. Go 14. Or even 16, for that is prob where all the big conferences are going. Might as well go for it now, have your picks of the litter. Yeah and my CARDS are easily the nest puck if the litter over any other school in the nation unless its the SEC they already have UK for the tv market out here. Big 10, big 12, and the ACC should be all over us if they need one two, or three teams ti add. The ACC would be foolish if they chose uconn over us. I think we fit in great with the big 12 and that's where i would like to end up if I had to pick a conference to go too.
You still suck asshole for calling us loserville captain. You cut me deep u turncoat! U got the wrong man on that Beast. Though come next Thurs I might be looking to use that. | |
| | | captain organic Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Fri Nov 23, 2012 3:04 pm | |
| - Farmer1906 wrote:
- What needs to happen.
4 super conferences of 16 (sorry if you get left out, but the top 64 is good enough for me). 4 pods in each conference 4 team tourney for conference champion 4 team playoff of conference champions The conference runner ups play (Pac v B1G in Rose, Big XII v SEC in Sugar, etc...) The 1st round pods losers play (Big XII v SEC in Cotton, SEC v BIG in Capital One, etc...) Maybe have other bowls too, but it doesn't really matter.
Only problem is many of the top 64 would not be included on a year to year basis. I don't care that BC is in one of the big conf. they are not a top 64 team. There needs to be an avenue for non big conf teams. | |
| | | Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:54 pm | |
| - captain organic wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- What needs to happen.
4 super conferences of 16 (sorry if you get left out, but the top 64 is good enough for me). 4 pods in each conference 4 team tourney for conference champion 4 team playoff of conference champions The conference runner ups play (Pac v B1G in Rose, Big XII v SEC in Sugar, etc...) The 1st round pods losers play (Big XII v SEC in Cotton, SEC v BIG in Capital One, etc...) Maybe have other bowls too, but it doesn't really matter.
Only problem is many of the top 64 would not be included on a year to year basis. I don't care that BC is in one of the big conf. they are not a top 64 team. There needs to be an avenue for non big conf teams. When has a non top 64 team won a mnc? Ever? They can do their own thing. | |
| | | acccardinal12 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Cung Le, BJ Penn, Mayhem, Chael Sonnen, Anthony Pettis Posts : 10925 Join date : 2009-12-04 Age : 48 Location : Kentuckiana
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Fri Nov 23, 2012 5:15 pm | |
| - captain organic wrote:
- bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:
- captain organic wrote:
- OU wrote:
- bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:
- Yeah, cause it is the Big 12, not the Big 10.
Yeah and all the other big conferences are growing, can't get left behind. Fuck all the bull shit. Go 14. Or even 16, for that is prob where all the big conferences are going. Might as well go for it now, have your picks of the litter. Yeah and my CARDS are easily the nest puck if the litter over any other school in the nation unless its the SEC they already have UK for the tv market out here. Big 10, big 12, and the ACC should be all over us if they need one two, or three teams ti add. The ACC would be foolish if they chose uconn over us. I think we fit in great with the big 12 and that's where i would like to end up if I had to pick a conference to go too.
You still suck asshole for calling us loserville captain. You cut me deep u turncoat! U got the wrong man on that Beast.
Though come next Thurs I might be looking to use that. I coulda swore that was you. I'm still ending our thing though...turncoat! lol | |
| | | captain organic Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:58 pm | |
| - Farmer1906 wrote:
- captain organic wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- What needs to happen.
4 super conferences of 16 (sorry if you get left out, but the top 64 is good enough for me). 4 pods in each conference 4 team tourney for conference champion 4 team playoff of conference champions The conference runner ups play (Pac v B1G in Rose, Big XII v SEC in Sugar, etc...) The 1st round pods losers play (Big XII v SEC in Cotton, SEC v BIG in Capital One, etc...) Maybe have other bowls too, but it doesn't really matter.
Only problem is many of the top 64 would not be included on a year to year basis. I don't care that BC is in one of the big conf. they are not a top 64 team. There needs to be an avenue for non big conf teams. When has a non top 64 team won a mnc? Ever?
They can do their own thing. Well Boise has def been in the debate. TCU as well. | |
| | | Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:14 pm | |
| - captain organic wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- captain organic wrote:
- Farmer1906 wrote:
- What needs to happen.
4 super conferences of 16 (sorry if you get left out, but the top 64 is good enough for me). 4 pods in each conference 4 team tourney for conference champion 4 team playoff of conference champions The conference runner ups play (Pac v B1G in Rose, Big XII v SEC in Sugar, etc...) The 1st round pods losers play (Big XII v SEC in Cotton, SEC v BIG in Capital One, etc...) Maybe have other bowls too, but it doesn't really matter.
Only problem is many of the top 64 would not be included on a year to year basis. I don't care that BC is in one of the big conf. they are not a top 64 team. There needs to be an avenue for non big conf teams. When has a non top 64 team won a mnc? Ever?
They can do their own thing. Well Boise has def been in the debate. TCU as well. Boise, like TCU is good due to their weak schedules. Look what happened to TCU in the Big 12. TCU is already in a conference now. | |
| | | captain organic Bronze Belt
Posts : 7730 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : NJ
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:07 pm | |
| Boise went undefeated and beat Oklahoma in the Fiesta in 2006.(they also had a win over Oregon St that season). They then went undefeated and beat TCU in 2009(also had a win over Oregon that year).
In the proposed alignments a team like Boise would be left out in the cold, yet teams like Maryland, Kansas, BC, etc get a seat at the "big boy table"? Why because they've been lousy in their respective conf's for decades? Makes not sense to me.
And TCU did just beat Texas so let's not write them off as some schlub who was exposed upon entering the big time. . | |
| | | acccardinal12 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Cung Le, BJ Penn, Mayhem, Chael Sonnen, Anthony Pettis Posts : 10925 Join date : 2009-12-04 Age : 48 Location : Kentuckiana
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:15 pm | |
| Rutgers getting raped by Pitt like we did against the Cuse. CARDS down 10-0 to UConn and Bridgewater is out of the game with a messed up shoulder. Looking like Syracuse could win the Big East the way we're playing. | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: RU to Big 10.... | |
| |
| | | | RU to Big 10.... | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |