Where does Anderson rank of the GOAT list?

He is two. He is close to one. He could very easily be one next month.

Gee, after thinking about it, I would have to say he is the GOAT. Not only is he professional, but he has performed great not only as a MW but also as a LHW. He is the man, no question about it.

Number 1 or 2 definitely depends on how you rank Fedor.

Andrew the Raider King wrote:

Gee, after thinking about it, I would have to say he is the GOAT. Not only is he professional, but he has performed great not only as a MW but also as a LHW. He is the man, no question about it.

But how did he perform at WW?

OU wrote:

Andrew the Raider King wrote:

Gee, after thinking about it, I would have to say he is the GOAT. Not only is he professional, but he has performed great not only as a MW but also as a LHW. He is the man, no question about it.

But how did he perform at WW?

There was talk that he, not Hughes, was the #1 welterweight in the world at one time.

Ludo wrote:

OU wrote:

Andrew the Raider King wrote:

Gee, after thinking about it, I would have to say he is the GOAT. Not only is he professional, but he has performed great not only as a MW but also as a LHW. He is the man, no question about it.

But how did he perform at WW?

There was talk that he, not Hughes, was the #1 welterweight in the world at one time.

I THINK AT WW, AND AT HIS PRIME, HUGHES WOULD HAVE WRASSLE FUCKED AND POUNDED OUT A DECISION WIN AGAINST ANDERSON, THAT SAID, ANDERSON IS A MW AND HIS FIGHTS AT WW REALLY SHOULDN'T FACTOR IN WHAT HES DONE AT THIS CURRENT DIVISION

But it does factor in to GOAT talk because what you do makes you GOAT and Silva has done it in three divisions.

GDPofDRC wrote:

But it does factor in to GOAT talk because what you do makes you GOAT and Silva has done it in three divisions.

GOOD POINT, VERY GOOD POINT!

It's debateable really. Was Hughes' striking ever good enough to set up his takedowns against someone like Anderson?

Ludo wrote:

It's debateable really. Was Hughes' striking ever good enough to set up his takedowns against someone like Anderson?

Was Anderson's striking as good back in 2002?

Anyone when he moved from WW to MW?

It was pretty great in 2002.

It may not have been as good as it is today, but not much less either. He was still very fast and very accurate and very explosive with his striking.

Anderson never dominated at LHW.

freakzilla wrote:

Anderson never dominated at LHW.

He just decimated a former Heavyweight champion and Light Heavyweight champion by KO in under 5 combined minutes. No big deal, though.

Ludo wrote:

freakzilla wrote:

Anderson never dominated at LHW.

He just decimated a former Heavyweight champion and Light Heavyweight champion by KO in under 5 combined minutes. No big deal, though.

Wow, He beat Irvin and a washed up Forrest

freakzilla wrote:

Ludo wrote:

freakzilla wrote:

Anderson never dominated at LHW.

He just decimated a former Heavyweight champion and Light Heavyweight champion by KO in under 5 combined minutes. No big deal, though.

Wow, He beat Irvin and a washed up Forrest

So washed up that it was Forrest' first fight after losing the Light Heavyweight title, a fight he was winning by the way until he got dropped and pounded out from top position(the fight with Rashad of course). I like the way you think.

SEEMS LIKE FOREST IS ALWAYS WASHED UP LOL

killerofchicken wrote:

SEEMS LIKE FOREST IS ALWAYS WASHED UP LOL

Except when he wins, then you're totally not yelling. I mean... Wait, what?

Ludo wrote:

killerofchicken wrote:

SEEMS LIKE FOREST IS ALWAYS WASHED UP LOL

Except when he wins, then you're totally not yelling. I mean... Wait, what?

I'M ALWAYS YELLING YOU YELLOWBELLY!

stop shouting killer...wtf dude

and i always lol when freak tries to claim Forrest was washed up in his first fight after losing the UFC title.

IM POUTING

KILLER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!