Ninja's Place
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


[ A forum dedicated to hardcore combat sports fans. ]
 
Home PageHome Page  HomeHome  GalleryGallery  SearchSearch  Latest imagesLatest images  RegisterRegister  Log in  

 

 California Assembly Bill could give fighters new rights, challenge UFC contracts

Go down 
2 posters
AuthorMessage
Primetyme199
Brown Belt
Brown Belt
Primetyme199


Posts : 2916
Join date : 2009-07-30
Location : NJ

California Assembly Bill could give fighters new rights, challenge UFC contracts Empty
PostSubject: California Assembly Bill could give fighters new rights, challenge UFC contracts   California Assembly Bill could give fighters new rights, challenge UFC contracts EmptyThu Apr 12, 2012 10:29 am

http://www.fightopinion.com/2012/04/11/california-assembly-mma-bill/#more-12018

By Zach Arnold | April 11, 2012


Our friend Rob Maysey pointed out recent developments in California that deserve your attention.

Luis A. Alejo, California Assemblymember (Democrat, 28th district – Salinas), is proposing big changes to Assembly Bill 2100. The bill, which is a Bill of Rights for both professional boxers & Mixed Martial Arts fighters, currently is laid out as the following according to this AB 2100 fact sheet.

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE

LUIS A. ALEJO, Assemblymember, 28th District

STATE CAPITOL
Room 2137
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 319-2028 Phone
(916) 319-2128 Fax

DISTRICT OFFICE
100 West Alisal Street
Suite 134
Salinas, CA 93901
(831) 759-8676 Phone
(831) 759-2961 Fax

AB 2100: Professional Bill of Rights for MMA Athletes Fact Sheet

Summary

AB 2100 authorizes the State Athletic Commission to revoke or refuse to renew the license of any mixed martial arts (MMA) promoter in California that participates in coercive and unfair contracting practices. This bill also extends the scope of the Boxers’ Pension Plan to include professional MMA fighters licensed in California.

Purpose

The purpose of the bill is to prevent the mistreatment of MMA fighters in California by banning certain exploitative contracting practices that violate athletes’ freedom to work and their ability to support their families. Many California MMA fighters have retired after suffering multiple concussions, bone fractures, muscle tears, nerve damage and spine injuries, which threaten their ability to earn a living and support their families as they grow older. AB 2100 enables MMA fighters to benefit from the pension fund that has been available to boxers in the state since 1981.

Background

Mixed martial arts, also known as MMA, is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Many of the most talented and well-known professional fighters in the sport live in California and are licensed to compete in events held in this state. Since 2006, California has hosted more than 60 professional MMA events, making California a center of the mixed-martial arts world.

Fighters licensed in California who compete in these contests often undergo years of demanding training, and risk serious injury. Despite these physical risks, California MMA fighters have no pension benefits and limited protection against exploitation. Promoters often require that MMA fighters in California agree to coercive and oppressive contract terms that can include exclusivity clauses, unlimited merchandise rights agreements and legal waivers among other things.

This bill will protect professional MMA fighters from unethical business practices and would extend legal protection currently afforded to professional boxers by the Boxers’ Pension Plan and the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act of 2000.

For more information on this bill, please contact Erika Bustamante at (916) 319-2028, e-mail erika.bustamante@asm.ca.gov.

*************

Now that you’ve seen the fact sheet for AB 2100, you have a sense of what the legislation is about. However, this week new changes were proposed by Assemblyman Alejo to AB 2100 that would change the landscape in a significant way. The proposed changes could give California MMA fighters a significant boost in terms of contractual rights and would take away some legitimate power from the major player(s) in MMA.

Let’s just say that Zuffa (UFC) will not be very happy about the proposed contractual changes. The proposed changes in this bill could spark a legal battle given that UFC contracts establish jurisdiction in Las Vegas, so how would a Zuffa fighter based in California be able to legally challenge the terms of the Zuffa contracts?


Here is the amended Assembly Bill 2100 text, which displays what the changes would look like to the bill:

AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 9, 2012
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 29, 2012

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2100

Introduced by Assembly Member Alejo
February 23, 2012

An act to amend Sections 18849, 18880, 18881, 18882, 18884, and 18887 of, and to add Section 18649 to, the Business and Professions Code, relating to athletes, and making an appropriation therefor.

AB 2100, as amended, Alejo. Athletes: mixed martial arts fighters.

Existing law, the State Athletic Commission Act, creates the State Athletic Commission and makes it responsible for licensing and regulating boxing, kickboxing, and martial arts matches and wrestling exhibitions. Existing law prohibits a promoter from having a proprietary interest in a boxer or mixed martial arts fighter without the approval of the commission. Existing law creates the continuously appropriated Boxers’ Pension Fund and requires the commission to establish a pension plan for boxers and to deposit the moneys collected by the pension plan into the fund.

This bill would require a promoter to provide specified written and sworn statements regarding his or her financial interests to the commission before the promoter can receive compensation from a boxing or mixed martial arts contest. By requiring a statement to be made under penalty of perjury, the bill would expand that crime and would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also require the commission to revoke or refuse to renew the license of a mixed martial arts promoter who enters into a coercive contract, as defined, with a mixed martial arts fighter, who has been convicted of a felony or a gross misdemeanor, or who has been subject to specified law enforcement actions, investigations, or allegations. This bill would require the commission to establish a professional code of conduct for licensees. This bill would also extend the scope of the Boxers’ Pension Plan to include professional mixed martial arts fighters and would
rename the fund as the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. By providing for new moneys to be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 18649 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:

18649. (a) The commission shall revoke or refuse to renew the license of any mixed martial arts promoter that enters into a contract with a mixed martial arts fighter in the state of California if the contract contains one or more coercive provisions. A contract provision shall be considered coercive to the extent that it does any of the following:

(1) Assigns any future merchandising rights to a promoter beyond the term of the promotional contract.
(2) Automatically renews the contract or extends the term without good faith, arms-length negotiation.
(3) Grants the promoter a right to match the terms of a competing offer or contract.
(4) Grants the promoter a right to enter into exclusive negotiations with a mixed martial arts fighter.
(5) Restricts a mixed martial arts fighter from sponsoring another firm, product, or individual.
(6) Requires a mixed martial arts fighter to relinquish any legal claims for negligence that the fighter has, or may acquire in the future, against the promoter.
(7) Restricts a mixed martial arts fighter from contracting with another promoter.
(Cool Requires a mixed martial arts fighter to forfeit any rights as a condition precedent to the fighter’s participation in a contest.
(b) The commission shall revoke or refuse to renew the license of any promoter if it finds that the promoter, or any person or entity that is a partner, agent, employee, stockholder, or associate of the promoter, has been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude in any jurisdiction; is currently the subject of a state or federal criminal investigation; has been subject to a state or federal tax lien within the past five years; has failed to respond to a subpoena issued by any government agency; has been found to have violated any local, state, or federal law; has been sanctioned by a local, state, or federal judge; or has been credibly alleged to have violated international human rights standards.

(c) To ensure that individuals and entities licensed under this act observe common standards of decency, the commission shall, in consultation with the Association of Boxing Commissioners, establish a professional code of ethical conduct. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, the commission shall enforce the code of ethical conduct.

SEC. 2. Section 18849 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18849. No promoter, nor any person having a proprietary interest in the promoter, shall have, either directly or indirectly, any proprietary interest in a boxer or martial arts fighter competing on the premises owned, leased, or rented by the promoter without written approval from the commission. No promoter shall be entitled to receive any compensation directly or indirectly in connection with a contest until the promoter provides to the commission the following:

(a) A copy of any agreement in writing to which the promoter is a party with any professional athlete or contestant licensed under this act.

(b) A statement made under penalty of perjury that there are no other agreements, written or oral, between the promoter and the athlete with respect to that contest.

(c) All fees, charges, and expenses that will be assessed by or through the promoter on the athlete participating in the event, including any portion of the athlete’s purse that the promoter will receive.

(d) Any reduction in the athlete’s purse contrary to a previous agreement between the promoter and the athlete.

SEC. 3. Section 18880 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18880. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(1) That professional athletes licensed under this chapter, as a group, for many reasons, do not retain their earnings, and are often injured or destitute, or both, and unable to take proper care of themselves, whether financially or otherwise, and that the enactment of this article is to serve a public purpose by making provisions for a needy group to insure a modicum of financial security for professional athletes.
(2) Athletes licensed under this chapter may suffer extraordinary disabilities in the normal course of their trade. These may include acute and chronic traumatic brain injuries, resulting from multiple concussions as well as from repeated exposure to a large number of subconcussive punches, eye injuries, including retinal tears, holes, and detachments, and other neurological impairments.
(3) The pension plan of the commission is part of the state’s health and safety regulatory scheme, designed to protect boxers and mixed martial arts fighters licensed under this chapter from the health-related hazards of their trade. The pension plan addresses those health and safety needs, recognizing the disability and health maintenance expenses those needs may require.
(4) The regulatory system of California is interrelated with the conduct of the trade in every jurisdiction. Athletes licensed under this chapter participate in contests in other states and many athletes who are based in those other jurisdictions may participate in California on a single-event basis.
(5) The outcomes and natures of fights in other jurisdictions are relevant to California regulatory jurisdiction and are routinely monitored for health and safety reasons, so that, for example, a knockout of an athlete licensed under this chapter in another jurisdiction is paid appropriate heed with respect to establishing a waiting period before that athlete may commence fighting in California.
(6) The monitoring of other jurisdictions is an integral part of the health and safety of California athletes licensed under this chapter due to the interstate nature of the trade, and therefore the regulatory scheme for contests and athletes under this chapter should reflect this accordingly.
(7) Some mixed martial arts promoters licensed under this chapter engage in certain exploitative, oppressive, and coercive contractual practices that violate athletes’ freedom to work and their ability to support themselves and their families as professional athletes.
(Cool It is necessary and appropriate to establish standards to protect the rights and welfare of mixed martial arts fighters licensed under this chapter from unscrupulous promoters and coercive contractual practices.
(b) The provisions of this article pertain only to professional boxers and mixed martial arts fighters licensed under this chapter.

SEC. 4. Section 18881 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18881. (a) The commission shall, consistent with the purposes of this article, establish a pension plan for professional boxers and professional mixed martial arts fighters who engage in boxing or mixed martial arts contests in this state.

(b) The commission shall, consistent with the purposes of this article, establish the method by which the pension plan will be financed, including those who shall contribute to the financing of the pension plan. The method of financing the pension plan may include, but is not limited to, assessments on tickets and contributions by boxers, mixed martial arts fighters, managers, promoters, or any one or more of these persons, in an amount sufficient to finance the pension plan. Any promoter that receives a fee for televising a boxing or mixed martial arts contest performed in the State of California on a pay-per-view or network telecast shall pay 5 percent of the gross receipts from the telecast, exclusive of federal, state, or local taxes, into the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. For purposes of this section, the term “sufficient” means that the annual contributions shall be calculated to achieve no less than the average level of annual aggregate pension plan contributions from all sources for the period from July 1, 1981, through December 31, 1994, and adjusted thereafter to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for California as set forth by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

(c) Any pension plan established by the commission shall be actuarially sound.

SEC. 5. Section 18882 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18882. (a) At the time of payment of the fee required by Section 18824, a promoter shall pay to the commission all amounts scheduled for contribution to the pension plan. If the commission, in its discretion, requires pursuant to Section 18881, that contributions to the pension plan be made by the boxer or mixed martial arts fighter and his or her manager, those contributions shall be made at the time and in the manner prescribed by the commission.

(b) The Boxers’ Pension Fund is hereby continued in existence and renamed as the Boxers’ and Mixed Marital Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. All contributions to finance the pension plan shall be deposited in the State Treasury and credited to the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 13340 of the Government Code, all moneys in the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund are hereby continuously appropriated to be used exclusively for the purposes and administration of the pension plan.

(c) The Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund is a retirement fund, and no moneys within it shall be deposited or transferred to the General Fund.

(d) The commission has exclusive control of all funds in the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. No transfer or disbursement in any amount from this fund shall be made except upon the authorization of the commission and for the purpose and administration of the pension plan.

(e) Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, the commission or its designee shall invest the money contained in the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund according to the same standard of care as provided in Section 16040 of the Probate Code. The commission has exclusive control over the investment of all moneys in the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. Except as otherwise prohibited or restricted by law, the commission may invest the moneys in the fund through the purchase, holding, or sale of any investment, financial instrument, or financial transaction that the commission in its informed opinion determines is prudent.

(f) The administrative costs associated with investing, managing, and distributing the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund shall be limited to no more than 20 percent of the average annual contribution made to the fund in the previous two years, not including any investment income derived from the corpus of the fund. Diligence shall be exercised by administrators in order to lower the fund’s expense ratio as far below 20 percent as feasible and appropriate. The commission shall report to the Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions, and Consumer Protection on the impact of this provision during the next regularly scheduled sunset review after January 1, 2007.

SEC. 6. Section 18884 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18884. (a) A promoter may, but is not required to, add to the price of each ticket sold for a professional boxing or professional mixed martial arts contest, an amount specifically designated on the ticket for contribution as a donation, either or both, to the pension plan established pursuant to Section 18881. The additional amount shall not be subject to the admissions tax required by Section 18824 or any other deductions. Nothing in this section shall authorize the addition of such amounts to less than all the tickets sold for the professional boxing or professional mixed martial arts contest involved. The promoter shall pay additional contributions collected in accordance with Section 18881.

(b) Any additional contributions received pursuant to this section shall not be considered to offset any of the contributions required by the commission under Section 18881.

SEC. 7. Section 18887 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18887. In addition to any other form in which retirement benefits may be distributed under the pension plan, the commission may, in its discretion, award to a covered boxer or a covered mixed martial arts fighter, a medical early retirement benefit in the amount contained in the covered boxer’s or covered mixed martial arts fighter’s pension plan account at the time the commission makes this award and in the manner provided in the regulations governing the boxers’ and mixed martial arts fighters’ pension plan. This benefit shall be in lieu of a pension.

SEC. 8. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.

Back to top Go down
GDPofDRC
Administrator
Administrator
GDPofDRC


Favorite Fighter(s) : Shogun, Fedor, Wand, Saku, Hendo, BJ, Bas, Cain, Mike Vallely
Posts : 21274
Join date : 2009-08-04
Age : 105
Location : Fresyes, CA

California Assembly Bill could give fighters new rights, challenge UFC contracts Empty
PostSubject: Re: California Assembly Bill could give fighters new rights, challenge UFC contracts   California Assembly Bill could give fighters new rights, challenge UFC contracts EmptyThu Apr 12, 2012 11:35 am

All of those amendments seem fair and beneficial to the athlete. Good.
Back to top Go down
https://www.youtube.com/v/skCV2L0c6K0
 
California Assembly Bill could give fighters new rights, challenge UFC contracts
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver Effectively Kills 2011 MMA Bill
» Top 5 non-UFC fighters that could challenge for UFC gold
» Xtreme Couture fighters give their thoughts on Anderson Silva vs. Demian Maia fight
» Give Herschel Walker 6 more months and he will give Fedor problems IMO
» Bellators contracts are horrible

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Ninja's Place :: Fight Discussion :: MMA-
Jump to: