| Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... | |
|
+2GDPofDRC Andrew the Raider King 6 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
Andrew the Raider King Red Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Chael, Sexyama, Condit, Hendricks, Cowboy, Struve Posts : 4356 Join date : 2009-07-17 Age : 54 Location : Montgomery, AL
| Subject: Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:12 pm | |
| ...who should he fight so he can earn his paycheck and have a shot to at least compete?
I say Mark Coleman or Stephen Bonnar | |
|
| |
GDPofDRC Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Shogun, Fedor, Wand, Saku, Hendo, BJ, Bas, Cain, Mike Vallely Posts : 21274 Join date : 2009-08-04 Age : 104 Location : Fresyes, CA
| Subject: Re: Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:04 pm | |
| The Janitor, then Jardine. | |
|
| |
Farmer1906 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Griffin, Franklin, Hendo, Sonnen, Wand, Lawler, Belfort, Pettis, Aldo, Mousasi Posts : 10222 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : Texas
| Subject: Re: Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:43 pm | |
| I wouldn't mind seeing him fight Coleman. Then if he wins move up to someone like Forrest, Franklin, or Hendo. | |
|
| |
Wolfgangsta Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Conor McGregor, Machida, Jon Jones, Ronda Rousey Posts : 18955 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : USA
| Subject: Re: Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:45 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
ohiovol62 Purple Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Sakuraba, Fedor, GSP, and Big Nog Posts : 1079 Join date : 2009-09-11 Age : 39 Location : Dayton Ohio
| Subject: Re: Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:15 am | |
| Coleman would beat him. Bring in a tomato can first. | |
|
| |
SOKO Black Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : The Dragon, Kenflo, Hendo, Guida, Ace, Wand, Cain, Carwin, Foreman, Evander, Oscar Posts : 3362 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 43 Location : atlanta
| Subject: Re: Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:41 am | |
| kimbo at hw chuck via knee bar. lol | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... | |
| |
|
| |
| Let us assume Chuck is not retiring... | |
|