Strikeforce Phase II Plan For 2011: PPV, Expansion

Wolfgangsta wrote:

yea because a company known for keeping fighter wages down and restrictive controlling contracts wouldn't get worse with no alternative options for it's athletes.

You graduated? Sue the college you went to.

Can you be his lawyer?

OU wrote:

Wolfgangsta wrote:

yea because a company known for keeping fighter wages down and restrictive controlling contracts wouldn't get worse with no alternative options for it's athletes.

You graduated? Sue the college you went to.

Can you be his lawyer?

NO, he'd probably KO the opposing lawyer

Nah, plus it's tough to talk college with someone who never went you know.
...

And the UFC actually pays fighter better and more realistically then SF. Also,I doubt they'd hurt the credibility of the sport and their Organization by keeping wages down if they were a single Org in MMA. The way they restrict contracts now is in ways just good business too, when you take into context the Org. There's a fan angle and a business angle to those arguments

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

Wolfgangsta wrote:

yea because a company known for keeping fighter wages down and restrictive controlling contracts wouldn't get worse with no alternative options for it's athletes.

You graduated? Sue the college you went to.

Can you be his lawyer?

NO, he'd probably KO the opposing lawyer

More like get KO'd

nah, wolf throws punches harder than Fedor... we know this

A month ago LA was taking a break from college. Now he's a graduate already. Time to take your Christmas break Pinocchio.

LOL, break before which ever Grad school I decide on, I'm 23 of course I finished my UG.

But my break has been far to long to be honest, been over a year, time to get mvoin on..

Strikeforce should defenitly give their brand name and roster growth another 2 years before considering PPV. Unless they know they got something that will draw buys in face of a free counter program.

Hate to reference Dana White in regards to Strikeforce but he said the thing that makes Strikeforce smart is that they have stayed away from PPV. I agree.

Not saying that SF will never do PPV because the longer there around, the more recognition their brand name gets and the more high quality fighters they have, but 2011 won't be that year.

Strikeforce should look to put on more main cards on Showtime and get on CBS 3-4 times in 2011.

killerofchicken wrote:

OU wrote:

Wolfgangsta wrote:

yea because a company known for keeping fighter wages down and restrictive controlling contracts wouldn't get worse with no alternative options for it's athletes.

You graduated? Sue the college you went to.

Can you be his lawyer?

NO, he'd probably KO the opposing lawyer

I would hope he wouldn't hit a lady in a court room Killer.

KingsOwn19 wrote:

Strikeforce should defenitly give their brand name and roster growth another 2 years before considering PPV. Unless they know they got something that will draw buys in face of a free counter program.

Hate to reference Dana White in regards to Strikeforce but he said the thing that makes Strikeforce smart is that they have stayed away from PPV. I agree.

Not saying that SF will never do PPV because the longer there around, the more recognition their brand name gets and the more high quality fighters they have, but 2011 won't be that year.

Strikeforce should look to put on more main cards on Showtime and get on CBS 3-4 times in 2011.

My feelings exactly. The only way they'd be able to capitulate the UFC into not countering their product is threatening or actually countering the UFC's with a free product.