| Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Ziggy116 Black Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Rampage, Fedor, Gangster brothers, Aldo Posts : 3288 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 43 Location : Cedar Rapids
| Subject: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:53 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
bobbitt15 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Chael Sonnen, Michael Chandler, Jorge Masvidal, Carlos Condit Posts : 14830 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 35 Location : Cincinnati
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:16 pm | |
| When one of them is free and barely Fight Night caliber than I say go for it lol | |
|
| |
KingsOwn19 Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva,Dan Henderson, Emelianenko Fedor, Josh Barnett Posts : 12421 Join date : 2009-07-16 Location : Northern California
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:47 pm | |
| I think they should drop the numbers all together because eventually it's going to start sounding stupid. They should have stopped at 100. They should only number it when it's an actual milestone. I'm guessing this is a different thread all together. | |
|
| |
Ziggy116 Black Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Rampage, Fedor, Gangster brothers, Aldo Posts : 3288 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 43 Location : Cedar Rapids
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:00 am | |
| No I know what you mean Kings. Don't wanna go WWE style though...are you saying name them? | |
|
| |
KingsOwn19 Administrator
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva,Dan Henderson, Emelianenko Fedor, Josh Barnett Posts : 12421 Join date : 2009-07-16 Location : Northern California
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:07 am | |
| I'm just saying if it's Machida vs. Rampage it should be UFC: Machida vs. Rampage
Dana was saying way back in 2008 that he wants to get rid of the numbers but it's hard to do because all the media and fans number them. Once it gets to 176 or something, it's gonna start sounding stupid. | |
|
| |
bobbitt15 Gold Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Chael Sonnen, Michael Chandler, Jorge Masvidal, Carlos Condit Posts : 14830 Join date : 2009-07-16 Age : 35 Location : Cincinnati
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:52 am | |
| It will sound stupid but the only other thing would be like you said the names of the fighters. It was terrible when they had corny nicknames for them like "Meltdown" | |
|
| |
r3dman7630 Orange Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Hendo, Fedor, Big Nog, Couture, Shogun, Gomi, Carrano, any one who fights Brock! and all the underdogs.... Posts : 301 Join date : 2010-04-15 Location : New Mexico
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:31 am | |
| I agree with the milestone idea...100, 200... Name the events after the fighter, main event, maybe nicknames? " UFC RAMPAGE VS. DRAGON" ??? | |
|
| |
LA Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Lyoto Machida, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva, Jose Aldo Posts : 15046 Join date : 2009-07-15 Age : 37 Location : Boston, Mass and Los Angeles, California
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:22 am | |
| They can be, just make sure it's a solid event, with the merger, events should always be solid from here on out. | |
|
| |
Wolfgangsta Platinum Belt
Favorite Fighter(s) : Conor McGregor, Machida, Jon Jones, Ronda Rousey Posts : 18955 Join date : 2009-07-15 Location : USA
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:45 am | |
| UFC number, then a title for the event or the names of the headliners. This is how it's always been done. Always will be. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks | |
| |
|
| |
| Should never be numbered events in back to back weeks | |
|