Prime Lennox Lewis vs Prime Rocky Marciano

12 rd fight. Both are motivated and fight to their limits. Who wins?

Lewis all day

I agree.

Lennox better not get hit.

Marciano wouldn't reach him.

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

Marciano wouldn't reach him.

And you say that based on Marciano always getting to everyone or Lennox never getting hit by anyone?

On the basis that Lewis was a smart fighter and that he would outsmart Marciano. Who did you vote for Marble?

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

On the basis that Lewis was a smart fighter and that he would outsmart Marciano. Who did you vote for Marble?

Lewis was SMARTER????????????????????

The guy who couldn't figure out how to outjab Evander or avoid Rahman or McCall was SMARTER???????????

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Watch Marciano track down Walcott or figuire out how to get Ezzard out when he has one round to do so or watch him figure out how to get rid of Harry Matthews.

Lewis has a bunch of advantages here, but ring smarts is NOT one of them.

He wasn't motivated in his 2 losses. Those fights were lost before the fight even started. So who did you vote for?

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

He wasn't motivated in his 2 losses. Those fights were lost before the fight even started. So who did you vote for?

OK, so Lennox is extraordinarily vulnerable in a second way. He isn't even disciplined enough to always show up in top shape. Not something anyone ever accused Marciano of.

I'm passing on the vote.

marbleheadmaui wrote:

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

He wasn't motivated in his 2 losses. Those fights were lost before the fight even started. So who did you vote for?

OK, so Lennox is extraordinarily vulnerable in a second way. He isn't even disciplined enough to always show up in top shape. Not something anyone ever accused Marciano of.

I'm passing on the vote.

Why? so you don't get ridiculed for voting Marciano? Anyway, the question I was asking was if both fought their best not for their whole career. The Lewis that lost has nothing to do with this fight as he wasn't at his best then.

Here is the formula.

Fighter from the 50's or before can only be beaten by one of his fellow superhumans from the 50's or before.

DUHHHHHHHH. How do we not know this by now, people?

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

marbleheadmaui wrote:

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

He wasn't motivated in his 2 losses. Those fights were lost before the fight even started. So who did you vote for?

OK, so Lennox is extraordinarily vulnerable in a second way. He isn't even disciplined enough to always show up in top shape. Not something anyone ever accused Marciano of.

I'm passing on the vote.

Why? so you don't get ridiculed for voting Marciano? Anyway, the question I was asking was if both fought their best not for their whole career. The Lewis that lost has nothing to do with this fight as he wasn't at his best then.

LOL, yeah being ridiculed by anonymous interweb dudes is really troubling. What are you six years old?

I don't vote on things like this because the concept carries no weight.

Lewis is more vulnerable to big punchers than any othe heavyweight champion excpet maybe Floyd Patterson.

KrazyHorseBennett wrote:

Here is the formula.

Fighter from the 50's or before can only be beaten by one of his fellow superhumans from the 50's or before.

DUHHHHHHHH. How do we not know this by now, people?

Lol. Totally agree.

KrazyHorseBennett wrote:

Here is the formula.

Fighter from the 50's or before can only be beaten by one of his fellow superhumans from the 50's or before.

DUHHHHHHHH. How do we not know this by now, people?

That's just dumb. Foreman beats Rocky, so does Ali and Frazioer and Evander are both bloodbaths that I can't really pick. I said last week so does Riddick Bowe in my view. But the Lewis who was KO'd by Rahman and McCall?

That's not nearly as obvious.

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

marbleheadmaui wrote:

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

He wasn't motivated in his 2 losses. Those fights were lost before the fight even started. So who did you vote for?

OK, so Lennox is extraordinarily vulnerable in a second way. He isn't even disciplined enough to always show up in top shape. Not something anyone ever accused Marciano of.

I'm passing on the vote.

Why? so you don't get ridiculed for voting Marciano? Anyway, the question I was asking was if both fought their best not for their whole career. The Lewis that lost has nothing to do with this fight as he wasn't at his best then.

BTW, you think you can train a chin? How exactly does one do that?

marbleheadmaui wrote:

KrazyHorseBennett wrote:

Here is the formula.

Fighter from the 50's or before can only be beaten by one of his fellow superhumans from the 50's or before.

DUHHHHHHHH. How do we not know this by now, people?

That's just dumb. Foreman beats Rocky, so does Ali and Frazioer and Evander are both bloodbaths that I can't really pick. I said last week so does Riddick Bowe in my view. But the Lewis who was KO'd by Rahman and McCall?

That's not nearly as obvious.

Dude, I'm just poking the bear with a stick.

marbleheadmaui wrote:

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

marbleheadmaui wrote:

freakzilla316ftw wrote:

He wasn't motivated in his 2 losses. Those fights were lost before the fight even started. So who did you vote for?

OK, so Lennox is extraordinarily vulnerable in a second way. He isn't even disciplined enough to always show up in top shape. Not something anyone ever accused Marciano of.

I'm passing on the vote.

Why? so you don't get ridiculed for voting Marciano? Anyway, the question I was asking was if both fought their best not for their whole career. The Lewis that lost has nothing to do with this fight as he wasn't at his best then.

LOL, yeah being ridiculed by anonymous interweb dudes is really troubling. What are you six years old?

I don't vote on things like this because the concept carries no weight.

Lewis is more vulnerable to big punchers than any othe heavyweight champion excpet maybe Floyd Patterson.

You make a topic saying that Riddick Bowe on his day was almost unstoppable yet you play down Lewis. Bowe was too terrified to face Lewis.