No Megan Fox for Transformers 3

Paramount is parting ways with Megan Fox on "Transformers 3."

A studio spokeswoman disclosed Wednesday that Par has decided against picking up Fox's option to star as Mikaela Banes in the third installment, but declined to elaborate.

Sources close to the production indicated that Par and director Michael Bay want to take the storyline in another direction and plans to cast another actress as the love interest for star Shia LaBeouf, who plays Sam Witwicky. Those sources indicated that Fox's ouster was un- related to a September interview with a British magazine in which Fox compared Bay with Adolf Hitler.

Bay's directing from a script by Ehren Krueger with the storyline kept under wraps. Working title is "Transformers 3."

Pic, produced by Lorenzo di Bonaventura and Ian Bryce, is set to open July 1, 2011. Steven Spielberg is exec producing.

Patrick Dempsey, Frances McDormand, John Malkovich and Ken Jeong have signed on to the project. Thesps Kevin Dunn and Julie White will return in the roles of Ron Witwicky and Judy Witwicky.

"Transformers" is Paramount's most valuable franchise, particularly since the studio is the sole financier. The first "Transformers" grossed $709.7 million worldwide, followed by $836.4 million for last year's "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen."

Initially, Bay had wanted to take a longer break before lensing the threequel, but ultimately decided to meet the studio's summer 2011 release date.

Fox will be seen next in Warner's supernatural Western "Jonah Hex" opposite Josh Brolin. "Hex" opens June 18.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118019614.html?categoryid=13&cs=1&ref=vertfilm

she fucking needs to go to porn or go away

Transformers sucks

bobbitt15 wrote:

Transformers sucks

They do, but at least they put Megan in skimpy outfits.

Ali_1748 wrote:

bobbitt15 wrote:

Transformers sucks

They do, but at least they put Megan in skimpy outfits.

YOU BOTH TAKE THAT BACK NOW!

bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:

Ali_1748 wrote:

bobbitt15 wrote:

Transformers sucks

They do, but at least they put Megan in skimpy outfits.

YOU BOTH TAKE THAT BACK NOW!

Sorry Beast both of the Transformers movies were a steaming pile or manure.

Yeah off a bit, but the TRANSFORMERS RULE!

bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:

Yeah off a bit, but the TRANSFORMERS RULE!

The original cartoon ruled.

Ali_1748 wrote:

bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:

Yeah off a bit, but the TRANSFORMERS RULE!

The original cartoon ruled.

Good enough. You get a pass my friend. I thought we might not talk for a week or two.

Man I still feel like shit from drinking and a cat falling asleep on me. I hate allergies!

These movies have been shitty, not having Fox in the next one drops my interest from 5% to 0%.


I think Megan Fox is the hottest worst actress ever

she is fucking hot when she is over 100 lbs.

tolivendiewithLA wrote:

I think Megan Fox is the hottest worst actress ever

Agreed no talent but very hot.

Glass houses people...

LikesToFightGuy wrote:

Glass houses people...

lol

She was probably the main reason I pained myself through Transformers 2.

bigbeastcardinal12 wrote:

Man I still feel like shit from drinking and a cat falling asleep on me. I hate allergies!

They say she never looks as good as the night before...

Anywho, no Megan Fox means I'm not even going to watch this movie.

No Megan Fox, no reason to watch.

i'll probably pass on this one then...

The chick replacing her is ugly as fuck

bobbitt15 wrote:

The chick replacing her is ugly as fuck

Who is it?

Some chick I've never heard of

http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/celebrities/gallery/2646/new-transformers-3-star-rosie-huntingtonwhiteley/fp#photo0

bobbitt15 wrote:

Some chick I've never heard of

http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/celebrities/gallery/2646/new-transformers-3-star-rosie-huntingtonwhiteley/fp#photo0

Fuck she is ugly. She better have one hell of a body.

oh man shex butt fucking ugly

Birdofthad wrote:

oh man shex butt fucking ugly

To make up for losing Fox they better show her getting donkey punched or something.