Joe Calzaghe and Bernard Hopkins together again

thats cool that they posed together, Bernard still wants a rematch

He deserved 1 also.

timthebim wrote:

He deserved 1 also.

Eh not really, Hopkins tactics against Calzaghe were atrocious, he tried to steal a victory and used many dirty tricks for breathers.

I gave him four rounds maximum.

I thought he won 5 at least but possibly 6.

timthebim wrote:

I thought he won 5 at least but possibly 6.

Bernard activity level was just too low to win any rounds on my card.

He fought alittle dirty but he has done it for years.

That first fight was awful.

I think most recent Hopkins fights are unentertaining, but that one was the worst.

Zero interest in a rematch.

Not to mention Joe is looking pretty pudgy.

captain organic wrote:

That first fight was awful.

I think most recent Hopkins fights are unentertaining, but that one was the worst.

Zero interest in a rematch.

Not to mention Joe is looking pretty pudgy.

He was also hooked on Coke for awhile also.

captain organic wrote:

That first fight was awful.

I think most recent Hopkins fights are unentertaining, but that one was the worst.

Zero interest in a rematch.

Not to mention Joe is looking pretty pudgy.

Disagree, I very muched enjoyed both Pascal fights and the Pavlik masterclass.

didn't see Pavlik.

But the Pascal fights were eh. I know people loved the fights, had some debate here on the topic, but 10 shots landed per rnd for the winner is not good theater imo.

It was a very good defensive fight.

Ali wrote:

timthebim wrote:

I thought he won 5 at least but possibly 6.

Bernard activity level was just too low to win any rounds on my card.

this is why i said when that fight happened bernard did just enough to lose.